Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing -d and -v options on Linux for corerun #5116

Closed
manu-st opened this issue Feb 12, 2016 · 1 comment · Fixed by #49529
Closed

Missing -d and -v options on Linux for corerun #5116

manu-st opened this issue Feb 12, 2016 · 1 comment · Fixed by #49529
Labels
area-Infrastructure-coreclr help wanted [up-for-grabs] Good issue for external contributors
Milestone

Comments

@manu-st
Copy link

manu-st commented Feb 12, 2016

It seems that the -d and -v options (available on Windows) are missing on Linux. Shouldn't they be there as well to ensure consistency between platforms?

@benpye
Copy link
Contributor

benpye commented Feb 15, 2016

Since the Unix style API is exposed everywhere, it might make sense to move away from the Windows specific corerun/coreconsole in favour of the xplat versions, and then there would be no difference in features between the two.

@manu-st manu-st changed the title Missing -d and -v options on Linux Missing -d and -v options on Linux for corerun Feb 17, 2016
@msftgits msftgits transferred this issue from dotnet/coreclr Jan 30, 2020
@msftgits msftgits added this to the Future milestone Jan 30, 2020
@ghost ghost added the in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged label Mar 14, 2021
@ghost ghost removed the in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged label Mar 17, 2021
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 16, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-Infrastructure-coreclr help wanted [up-for-grabs] Good issue for external contributors
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants