Update RC1 release notes #570
Conversation
hongdai
commented
Dec 2, 2015
hongdai
commented
- The scenario table are updated according to test results on Asp.Net 5 and UWP.
|
If you have issue numbers, would you mind adding a "more..." hyperlink to it like the other places with known issues? |
|
I will add the issue numbers I am aware of. |
| @@ -28,9 +28,9 @@ Supported features | |||
| ||NetHttpBinding|:white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :warning: [more...](https://github.com/dotnet/wcf/issues/534) | | |||
| ||NetTcpBinding|:white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :warning: [more...](https://github.com/dotnet/wcf/issues/534) | | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can "more..." point to multiple issues (if there are more than one)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could make "more..." a query, but I couldn't find any clean way to form accurate queries unique to the feature for that row in the table. I think it might be reasonable to make the NET Native and Linux columns use a query for labels "bug" and "NET Native" (or "Linux"). What do you think of adding new labels that correspond to the cells in the "Feature" column? It would allow self-maintaining queries and give us a better way to indicate "what feature is affected by this bug?".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We will need a query for RC1 only bugs. The issues status reflects the latest status,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point. Let's put more thoughts in this and not block this PR by it.
BTW, can we update the OS X column from
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, let's make OSX all ❓. And I agree, let's merge the PR and continue refining this table as we decide on improvements.
|
Issue #567 recommends changing the legend, which would affect many of the cells in this table. I like the proposed legend changes and recommend we expand this PR to that if fixes the legend as well as all the cells. We can make a separate PR to convert all the "more..." links to queries. |
| :x: -- Not supported | ||
| :white_check_mark: -- Works with no known major issues | ||
| :warning: -- Partially works with known issues or only partially tested | ||
| :x: -- Does not work | ||
|
|
||
|
|
hongdai
force-pushed
the
releasenote
branch
2 times, most recently
from
df45087
to
b61253c
Compare
| |MessageVersion|SOAP 1.1 UTF8|:white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :question: | | ||
| ||SOAP 1.2 UTF8|:white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :question: | | ||
| |Contracts | DataContract | :warning:[more...](https://github.com/dotnet/wcf/issues/325) | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :question: | | ||
| | | XmlSerializer | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | :question: | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Make sense. I'll update it.
* The scenario table are updated according to test results on Asp.Net 5 and UWP.
|
LGTM. Thanks @hongdai. |
|
LGTM |
