Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Merge pull request #1245 from egovernments/sandbox-changes" #1248

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: sandbox-develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ashish-egov
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit c4dfc2f, reversing changes made to 4f11afa.

This reverts commit c4dfc2f, reversing
changes made to 4f11afa.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 8, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes primarily involve refactoring several components in the micro-frontend structure, improving code clarity and usability. Key modifications include the introduction of a new CustomDatePicker component, simplification of the Sample component by removing excess styling and functionality, and updates to form handling in StepperForm. Additionally, import statements have been adjusted for consistency, and unused components have been removed to enhance maintainability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
CustomCheck.js, Sample.js Introduced CustomDatePicker for date selection; renamed and simplified Sample component, removing form-related features.
StepperForm.js, TabForm.js Updated import for CustomDatePicker, removed checkbox and gender fields, changed dob from date to string.
FormComposer/index.js Refactored rendering logic for form fields, improved tab navigation using react-tabs, and modified Card component to accept a key prop.
index.js Adjusted import statements, replacing SampleWithForm with Sample in exports.
user-app/src/App.js, user-app/src/pages/index.js Removed unused imports for Sample and SampleWithForm, cleaning up dependencies in the App and UserApp components.
microfrontend-layout.html Reordered route declarations for improved readability while maintaining existing routing functionality.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CustomDatePicker
    participant ParentComponent

    User->>ParentComponent: Interacts with date input
    ParentComponent->>CustomDatePicker: Passes value and onChange
    CustomDatePicker-->>ParentComponent: Sends new date value
    ParentComponent->>User: Updates UI with new date
Loading

🐰 Hop along to changes bright,
With a picker for dates, a joyful sight!
Forms are simpler, routes in line,
Code cleaner now, it's looking fine!
Celebrate the refactor, let’s all cheer,
For a happier codebase, year after year! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4dfc2f and bac7c41.

Files ignored due to path filters (5)
  • health/micro-ui/web/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json, !**/*.json
  • health/micro-ui/web/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
Files selected for processing (9)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/CustomCheck.js (1 hunks)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/Sample.js (1 hunks)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/components/StepperForm.js (5 hunks)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/components/TabForm.js (1 hunks)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/hoc/FormComposer/index.js (16 hunks)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/index.js (2 hunks)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/modules/user-app/src/App.js (1 hunks)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/modules/user-app/src/pages/index.js (3 hunks)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/root-app/src/microfrontend-layout.html (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/Sample.js
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/index.js
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/modules/user-app/src/App.js
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/modules/user-app/src/pages/index.js
  • micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/root-app/src/microfrontend-layout.html
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/CustomCheck.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/components/TabForm.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/components/StepperForm.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/hoc/FormComposer/index.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

Additional comments not posted (12)
micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/components/TabForm.js (1)

4-4: Verify the CustomDatePicker implementation.

The import path for CustomDatePicker has changed. Ensure the new implementation meets the expected functionality and integrates correctly with the rest of the code.

Verification successful

CustomDatePicker Implementation Verified

The implementation of CustomDatePicker in the new path is correct and aligns with the expected functionality. The component is correctly imported from ../CustomCheck. No issues found with the integration.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of CustomDatePicker in the new path.

# Test: Check the implementation details of CustomDatePicker.
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'const CustomDatePicker = ({ value, onChange }) => { $$$ }'

Length of output: 643

micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/components/StepperForm.js (3)

81-81: Review UI schema changes.

The ui:order for personalInfo has been updated. Ensure that the changes reflect the intended order and usability improvements.


17-17: Ensure correct handling of date strings.

The dob field type has changed from date to string with a format of date. Ensure that the form handles date strings correctly, especially in terms of validation and formatting.


5-5: Verify the CustomDatePicker integration.

The import path for CustomDatePicker has changed. Ensure the new implementation integrates correctly with the form and meets the expected functionality.

Verification successful

Integration of CustomDatePicker Verified

The CustomDatePicker is correctly imported and integrated into StepperForm.js. It is used as part of a schema, and the component's implementation aligns with its usage. No issues found with the integration.

  • File: micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/components/StepperForm.js
  • Component Definition: micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/CustomCheck.js
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of CustomDatePicker in StepperForm.

# Test: Check the usage of CustomDatePicker in the form.
rg --type javascript 'CustomDatePicker'

Length of output: 74


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of CustomDatePicker in StepperForm.

# Test: Check the usage of CustomDatePicker in JavaScript files.
rg 'CustomDatePicker' --glob '*.js' -A 5

Length of output: 3127

micro-frontends/sandbox-ui/packages/components/src/hoc/FormComposer/index.js (8)

25-26: Boolean input handling is well-implemented.

The addition of a checkbox for boolean properties improves clarity and correctness.


68-68: Array field rendering logic is consistent.

The logic for rendering array fields remains correct and consistent.


67-67: Remove unused and hardcoded theme variables.

The theme and toggleTheme variables are hardcoded and unused.


164-164: Field rendering logic is comprehensive.

The logic for rendering fields, including dependencies, is well-structured and correct.


164-164: Remove unused and hardcoded theme variables.

The theme and toggleTheme variables are hardcoded and unused.


402-456: Refactoring to use react-tabs is effective.

The transition to using react-tabs for tab navigation simplifies the code and improves usability.


341-341: Remove unused and hardcoded theme variables.

The theme and toggleTheme variables are hardcoded and unused.


1-4: Overall structure and logic are well-maintained.

The file structure is consistent, and the use of hooks is appropriate. Import statements align with the changes made.


const CustomDatePicker = ({ value, onChange }) => {
return (
<input type='dates' value={value ? new Date(value) : null} onChange={date => onChange(date ? date.toISOString() : '')} />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix the input type for the date picker.

The input element uses a type of 'dates', which is not a valid HTML5 input type. Consider using 'date' instead.

-      <input type='dates' value={value ? new Date(value) : null} onChange={date => onChange(date ? date.toISOString() : '')} />
+      <input type='date' value={value ? new Date(value).toISOString().split('T')[0] : ''} onChange={event => onChange(event.target.value)} />
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<input type='dates' value={value ? new Date(value) : null} onChange={date => onChange(date ? date.toISOString() : '')} />
<input type='date' value={value ? new Date(value).toISOString().split('T')[0] : ''} onChange={event => onChange(event.target.value)} />


const RenderIndividualField = React.memo(
({ name, property, uiWidget, control, errors, customWidgets }) => {
const CustomWidget = customWidgets[uiWidget];
const { theme, toggleTheme } = { theme: "light" };
const { theme, toggleTheme } = {theme:"light"};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove unused and hardcoded theme variables.

The theme and toggleTheme variables are hardcoded and unused across multiple components.

- const { theme, toggleTheme } = {theme:"light"};

Also applies to: 67-67, 164-164, 341-341

Comment on lines 473 to 483
const Card = ({ key, children }) => {
return (
<div
key={key}
style={{
border: "1px solid #ccc",
borderRadius: "4px",
padding: "10px",
margin: "10px 0",
boxShadow: "0 2px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)",
display: "flex",
flexWrap: "wrap",
}}
>
{React.Children.map(children, (child, index) => (
<div style={{ marginLeft: index === 0 ? 0 : "10px" }}>
{child}
</div>
))}
{children}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider renaming the key prop in Card.

Using key as a prop name can be misleading since key is a special prop in React. Consider renaming it to avoid confusion.

- const Card = ({ key, children }) => {
+ const Card = ({ cardKey, children }) => {
    return (
-     <div key={key} style={{
+     <div key={cardKey} style={{
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const Card = ({ key, children }) => {
return (
<div
key={key}
style={{
border: "1px solid #ccc",
borderRadius: "4px",
padding: "10px",
margin: "10px 0",
boxShadow: "0 2px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1)",
display: "flex",
flexWrap: "wrap",
}}
>
{React.Children.map(children, (child, index) => (
<div style={{ marginLeft: index === 0 ? 0 : "10px" }}>
{child}
</div>
))}
{children}
const Card = ({ cardKey, children }) => {
return (
<div
key={cardKey}
style={{
border: "1px solid #ccc",
padding: "10px",
margin: "10px 0",
}}
>
{children}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant