bug fixes for sandbox #1439
bug fixes for sandbox #1439
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to various CSS files and components within the micro-ui framework. Key changes involve updating stylesheet links in the HTML file to newer versions of CSS packages, enhancing the styling of multiple components through new styles and modifications, and adjusting properties in JavaScript files for better layout and functionality. These changes collectively aim to improve the visual presentation and maintainability of the user interface. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html (2)
Line range hint
13-15: Remove commented-out codeThere are several commented-out
<link>and<script>tags in the file. If these are no longer needed, it's best to remove them to keep the code clean and prevent confusion.Consider removing the following lines if they are no longer needed:
<!-- <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://unpkg.com/@egovernments/[email protected]/dist/index.css" /> --> <!-- <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://unpkg.com/@egovernments/digit-ui-css/dist/index.css"/> --> <!-- <script src="https://s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/egov-dev-assets/globalConfigs.js"></script> -->
17-17: Consider performance implications of using unpkg.comWhile using unpkg.com is convenient for development and testing, it may not be the best option for production environments due to potential performance and reliability issues.
Consider the following options:
- Host the CSS file on your own CDN or server for better control over availability and performance.
- If you decide to keep using unpkg.com, add integrity and crossorigin attributes to the link tag for better security:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://unpkg.com/@egovernments/[email protected]/dist/index.css" integrity="sha384-[hash]" crossorigin="anonymous" />Replace
[hash]with the actual integrity hash of the file.micro-ui/web/public/index.html (1)
Line range hint
1-35: Consider the following suggestions for improved security and performance:
- The commented out script for globalConfigs.js (line 17) should be removed if it's no longer needed, or uncommented if it's required.
- Consider using Subresource Integrity (SRI) for external resources to enhance security. This applies to the CSS files from unpkg.com and the xlsx script.
- If the xlsx library (line 16) is not used on all pages, consider loading it dynamically only when needed to improve initial page load performance.
Example of adding SRI:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://unpkg.com/@egovernments/[email protected]/dist/index.css" integrity="sha384-HASH_VALUE_HERE" crossorigin="anonymous">Replace HASH_VALUE_HERE with the actual hash of the file.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/uploadcomponents.scss (2)
49-49: Consider removing the!importantflag.While using
display: flexis a good choice for improving the layout, the!importantflag should be avoided when possible. It can make styles harder to maintain and override in the future.Instead of using
!important, consider increasing the specificity of the selector or reorganizing your CSS to ensure this rule takes precedence. For example:.multi-upload-wrap .upload-img-container { display: flex; }This approach maintains the desired layout while keeping the styles more maintainable.
Line range hint
58-69: Consider consolidating SVG styles for better maintainability.The current implementation has two separate style blocks for SVG elements within
.upload-img-container. To improve maintainability and reduce redundancy, consider consolidating these styles:.upload-img-container { // ... other styles ... svg { @apply flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; top: calc(50% - 21px); position: relative; } }This consolidation maintains the desired styling while making the code more concise and easier to maintain.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/pgr/src/components/timelineInstances/rejected.js (3)
18-18: Approve the dynamic path, but consider a more React-friendly approach.The addition of
/${window?.contextPath}makes the application more flexible for different deployment contexts. However, directly accessingwindowin React components can complicate server-side rendering.Consider using React's context API or environment variables to provide the
contextPath. This approach would be more aligned with React best practices and easier to manage across the application. For example:import { useContext } from 'react'; import { AppContext } from './AppContext'; // In your component const { contextPath } = useContext(AppContext); // Then use it in your Link <Link to={`/${contextPath}/citizen/pgr/${action.toLowerCase()}/${serviceRequestId}`}>This approach would require setting up a context provider higher up in your component tree, but it would make the code more maintainable and testable.
45-45: Approve for consistency, but consider refactoring to reduce repetition.The change is consistent with the earlier modification, which is good. However, the repetition of the path construction logic suggests an opportunity for refactoring.
Consider extracting the path construction into a helper function or constant to reduce repetition and improve maintainability. For example:
const getActionPath = (contextPath, action, serviceRequestId) => `/${contextPath}/citizen/pgr/${action.toLowerCase()}/${serviceRequestId}`; // Then use it in your Links <Link to={getActionPath(window?.contextPath, action, serviceRequestId)}>This approach would centralize the path logic, making it easier to update in the future and reducing the chance of inconsistencies.
Line range hint
1-53: Summary: Good changes, with room for further improvementThe modifications to use
window?.contextPathin the link paths improve the application's flexibility for different deployment contexts. This is a positive change that aligns with the PR objective of bug fixes for the sandbox environment.However, there are opportunities to further enhance the code:
- Consider using React's context API or environment variables instead of directly accessing
windowfor better compatibility with server-side rendering.- Extract the repeated path construction logic into a helper function or constant to reduce repetition and improve maintainability.
Implementing these suggestions would make the code more robust, maintainable, and aligned with React best practices.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/pgr/src/components/timelineInstances/resolved.js (2)
18-18: Approved: Dynamic URL path, but consider React-friendly alternativesThe addition of
/${window?.contextPath}makes the URL path more flexible for different deployment contexts. Good use of the optional chaining operator for safety.However, directly accessing
windowin a React component can complicate server-side rendering. Consider these alternatives:
- Use a context provider to supply the context path.
- Create a custom hook that safely accesses
windowwhen available.Ensure this pattern is used consistently throughout the application for maintainability.
45-45: Approved: Consistent change, but consider refactoringThe addition of
/${window?.contextPath}here maintains consistency with the earlier change. This is good for ensuring uniform behavior across the component.However, the repetition of this logic suggests an opportunity for refactoring:
- Consider creating a utility function for generating these URLs.
- This function could encapsulate the logic for including the context path and handle any necessary checks or formatting.
Example:
const generatePgrUrl = (action, serviceRequestId) => `/${window?.contextPath}/citizen/pgr/${action.toLowerCase()}/${serviceRequestId}`; // Usage <Link to={generatePgrUrl(action, serviceRequestId)}>This refactoring would improve maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistencies in future updates.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/sandbox.scss (1)
139-141: Consider alternative to negative marginWhile the negative bottom margin on
.digit-descriptionmay be intended to reduce space between elements, it could potentially cause layout issues. Consider using padding on the parent element or adjusting the layout structure to achieve the desired spacing without relying on negative margins.micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/index.scss (1)
Line range hint
1-586: Consider addressing TODOs and standardizing SCSS usage.While reviewing the file, I noticed a few areas for potential improvement:
- There are several TODO comments throughout the file. It might be beneficial to create issues for these todos and address them in future PRs.
- The file contains a mix of CSS and SCSS syntax. Consider fully leveraging SCSS features like nesting and variables to improve maintainability and readability.
- Some styles are using hard-coded values. Consider using variables for colors, sizes, and breakpoints to ensure consistency across the application.
To improve the overall quality and maintainability of the stylesheet:
- Create GitHub issues for each TODO comment to track and address them systematically.
- Refactor the stylesheet to consistently use SCSS syntax and features.
- Extract common values (colors, sizes, breakpoints) into variables at the top of the file or in a separate variables file.
- Consider breaking down this large stylesheet into smaller, more focused files for better organization and maintainability.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/hrms/src/pages/EmployeeDetails.js (1)
190-191: LGTM: Padding adjustment for assignment details.The added padding improves the visual spacing of the assignment details section. The changes are consistent with the coding style used in the rest of the file.
For consistency with the previous change, consider reordering the padding properties to have
paddingTopbeforepaddingLeft:- paddingLeft: "1rem", - paddingTop: "1rem", + paddingTop: "1rem", + paddingLeft: "1rem",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html (1 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/checkpoint.scss (1 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/inboxv2/searchComponentTable.scss (1 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/uploadcomponents.scss (2 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/index.scss (1 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/sandbox.scss (6 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/config/sidebar-menu.js (1 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/Landing/LandingComponent.js (1 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/hrms/src/pages/EmployeeDetails.js (2 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/pgr/src/components/timelineInstances/rejected.js (2 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/pgr/src/components/timelineInstances/resolved.js (2 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/react-components/src/molecules/SearchOnRadioButtons.js (1 hunks)
- micro-ui/web/public/index.html (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/config/sidebar-menu.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/Landing/LandingComponent.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/hrms/src/pages/EmployeeDetails.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/pgr/src/components/timelineInstances/rejected.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/pgr/src/components/timelineInstances/resolved.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/react-components/src/molecules/SearchOnRadioButtons.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: check
🔇 Additional comments (13)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/inboxv2/searchComponentTable.scss (1)
8-8: Consider the visual impact and accessibility of the white background.The addition of a white background color to table header cells may affect the overall design and readability of the table. Please ensure that:
- This change aligns with the design system and maintains consistency with other tables in the application.
- There is sufficient contrast between the background color and the text color in the table headers for optimal readability and accessibility.
- The white background doesn't negatively impact the visual hierarchy or the ability to distinguish between header and data cells.
To ensure consistency across the application, let's check for other table header styles:
This will help us verify if the white background is consistent with other table styles in the project.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html (2)
17-17: Approve CSS version update, but verify changesThe update to
@egovernments/[email protected]aligns with the PR objective of bug fixes. This minor version bump likely includes improvements or bug fixes relevant to the sandbox environment.To ensure the update doesn't introduce any unexpected changes, please:
- Review the changelog or release notes for version 0.0.2-beta.36.
- Test the application in the sandbox environment to verify that the UI components render correctly with the new CSS version.
18-18: Verify correct usage of %REACT_APP_GLOBAL%The script tag uses a placeholder
%REACT_APP_GLOBAL%which is likely replaced during the build process.Please ensure that:
- The build process correctly replaces this placeholder with the intended URL.
- The global configuration script is properly maintained and versioned.
- Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this script for better maintainability.
micro-ui/web/public/index.html (1)
10-10: LGTM. Verify the new CSS version in the sandbox environment.The update to
@egovernments/[email protected]aligns with the PR objective of bug fixes for the sandbox. This minor version bump in the beta release likely includes important fixes.To ensure the new version works as expected:
- Test the application in the sandbox environment.
- Verify that no visual regressions or new CSS-related issues are introduced.
- Check the changelog or release notes for
@egovernments/digit-ui-cssto understand the specific changes in this version.micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/uploadcomponents.scss (1)
59-60: Improved SVG centering using flexbox properties.The change from
margin: auto;tojustify-content: center;andalign-items: center;is a good improvement. This approach:
- Provides more explicit control over the alignment.
- Is consistent with flexbox best practices.
- Makes the centering behavior more predictable and easier to maintain.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/core/src/pages/employee/Landing/LandingComponent.js (1)
57-57: LGTM! Verify visual impact of button style change.The change from
variation="secondary"tovariation="primary"for the Continue button looks good. This will likely make the button more visually prominent on the landing page.Please verify the visual impact of this change in the UI to ensure it aligns with the intended design and user experience.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/sandbox.scss (6)
37-43: LGTM: Improved table header stylingThe addition of white background color to table header cells enhances the visual consistency of the table.
110-114: LGTM: Enhanced onboarding wrapper layoutThe addition of flex layout and improved typography for the sub-header enhances the visual structure of the onboarding wrapper.
120-128: LGTM: Consistent submit bar positioningThe alignment changes for both
.submit-bar-disabledand.submit-barensure consistent positioning at the bottom of their container, improving the overall layout.
252-254: LGTM: Full-width primary buttonsSetting the width of
.digit-button-primaryto 100% ensures consistent button sizing and improves usability, especially on mobile devices.
558-566: LGTM: Improved module card layoutThe new
.digit-home-moduleCardWrapperclass with flex layout enhances the structure of module cards on the home page. The combination offlex: 1andmax-width: fit-contentallows for flexible yet controlled card sizing.
568-578: LGTM with a suggestion: Verify layout impactThe changes to
.sandbox-landing-wrappermargin and.digit-uploader-contentbutton label width look good and should improve the layout. However, please verify that the new margin values for.sandbox-landing-wrapperdon't negatively impact the overall page layout, especially on different screen sizes.To verify the layout impact, you can run the following command:
This will help identify any media queries that might need adjustment based on the new margin values.
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/hrms/src/pages/EmployeeDetails.js (1)
158-159: LGTM: Padding adjustment for jurisdiction details.The added padding improves the visual spacing of the jurisdiction details section. The changes are consistent with the coding style used in the rest of the file.
| @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ const SideBarMenu = (t, closeSidebar, redirectToLoginPage, isEmployee) => [ | |||
| element: "HOME", | |||
| text: t("COMMON_BOTTOM_NAVIGATION_HOME"), | |||
| link: isEmployee ? `/${window?.contextPath}/employee` : `/${window?.contextPath}/citizen`, | |||
| icon: "Home", | |||
| icon: "HomeIcon", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent Usage of HomeIcon as a String
The icon property is set to "HomeIcon" as a string in sidebar-menu.js, while other parts of the codebase use <HomeIcon /> as a component without importing it in this file. This inconsistency can lead to rendering issues or runtime errors.
- Action Required:
- Import the
HomeIconcomponent insidebar-menu.js. - Update the
iconproperty to use theHomeIconcomponent instead of a string:import HomeIcon from 'path-to-HomeIcon'; // ... icon: <HomeIcon />,
- Import the
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the intended icon usage for the "HOME" menu item
The change from "Home" to "HomeIcon" for the icon property might lead to inconsistency or rendering issues. Other menu items in this file use component references for icons (e.g., <LogoutIcon className="icon" />), while this one uses a string.
Please verify if:
- "HomeIcon" is meant to be a component. If so, it should be imported and used like other icon components.
- There's a specific reason for using a string here instead of a component reference.
- This change resolves a bug as mentioned in the PR title "bug fixes for sandbox".
To help verify the icon usage across the codebase, you can run the following script:
This will help determine if "HomeIcon" is used consistently across the project and if it's imported as a component elsewhere.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for HomeIcon usage and import
# Test 1: Search for HomeIcon import
echo "Searching for HomeIcon import:"
rg --type js "import.*HomeIcon.*from"
# Test 2: Search for HomeIcon usage as a component
echo "Searching for HomeIcon usage as a component:"
rg --type js "<HomeIcon"
# Test 3: Search for other occurrences of HomeIcon as a string
echo "Searching for other occurrences of HomeIcon as a string:"
rg --type js '"HomeIcon"'
Length of output: 1353
| @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ | |||
| @apply flex; | |||
|
|
|||
| h2 { | |||
| z-index: 10; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Potential Ineffectiveness of z-index: 10;
The addition of z-index: 10; to the h2 element within .checkpoint-done may not effectively resolve the intended UI issue, as several other components in the codebase use significantly higher z-index values (e.g., z-index: 9999;, z-index: 10000;). This could result in the h2 element still being obscured by these higher-layer elements.
- Recommendation: Consider using a higher
z-indexvalue that aligns with the stacking context of related components to ensure theh2element appears as intended. Additionally, review the overall stacking order to prevent potential conflicts.
🔗 Analysis chain
Please provide more context about the bug being fixed.
The addition of z-index: 10; to the h2 element within .checkpoint-done will affect its stacking order, making it appear above other elements with lower z-index values. While this change might address a specific UI issue, more information is needed to fully understand its implications.
- Could you please elaborate on the specific bug this change is addressing?
- Have you considered any potential side effects on other UI elements that might rely on the previous stacking order?
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended consequences, please run the following command to check for other z-index usage in the codebase:
Additionally, I recommend adding a comment in the code to document the reason for this z-index change, which will help maintain the code's clarity for future developers.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for z-index usage in SCSS files
rg --type scss 'z-index:' -C 3
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for z-index usage in SCSS files
rg -g "*.scss" 'z-index:' -C 3
Length of output: 28248
| @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ const SearchOnRadioButtons = ({options,optionsKey,additionalWrapperClass,onSelec | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| return <div className="SearchOnRadioButton"> | |||
| <TextInput textInputStyle={{maxWidth:"100%"}} signature={true} signatureImg={<SignatureImage />} onChange={onSearchQueryChange || defaultSearchQueryChange} value={SearchQueryValue} placeholder={placeholder} /> | |||
| <TextInput signature={true} signatureImg={<SignatureImage />} onChange={onSearchQueryChange || defaultSearchQueryChange} value={SearchQueryValue} placeholder={placeholder} /> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Additional textInputStyle usages found in TextInput components.
Please update the following files to remove or refactor the textInputStyle prop:
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/engagement/src/components/Documents/Searchbar.jsmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/engagement/src/components/Surveys/SurveyForms/NewSurveyForm.jsmicro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/templates/ApplicationDetails/components/PermissionCheck.js
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consider verifying layout and using CSS classes.
The removal of the textInputStyle prop simplifies the TextInput component usage. However, please ensure this change doesn't cause any unexpected layout issues, especially in scenarios where the maximum width constraint was necessary.
If you need to control the width of the input, consider using CSS classes instead of inline styles. This approach would be more maintainable and consistent with best practices in React development.
To verify that this change doesn't introduce any layout issues, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other usages of TextInput with textInputStyle prop in the codebase
# Test: Search for TextInput components with textInputStyle prop
rg --type js 'TextInput.*textInputStyle'
# Note: If this returns any results, those instances might need to be updated as well.
Length of output: 706
| h3{ | ||
| margin-top: 0; | ||
| margin-bottom: 0; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix spelling and indentation, LGTM for margin changes.
- The class name
.hambuger-back-wrappercontains a spelling error. It should be.hamburger-back-wrapper. - The indentation of the new rules is inconsistent with the rest of the file. Use 2 spaces instead of 4 to match the existing style.
- The margin changes for the
h3element look good and will help maintain consistent spacing.
Please apply the following changes:
-.hambuger-back-wrapper {
+.hamburger-back-wrapper {
display: flex;
- h3{
- margin-top: 0;
- margin-bottom: 0;
- }
+ h3 {
+ margin-top: 0;
+ margin-bottom: 0;
+ }
@media (min-width: 780px) {
.hamburger-span {
display: none;
}
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| h3{ | |
| margin-top: 0; | |
| margin-bottom: 0; | |
| } | |
| .hamburger-back-wrapper { | |
| display: flex; | |
| h3 { | |
| margin-top: 0; | |
| margin-bottom: 0; | |
| } | |
| @media (min-width: 780px) { | |
| .hamburger-span { | |
| display: none; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
No description provided.