Updated few loggers

[jagankumar-egov]

No description provided.

[jagankumar-egov]

@coderabbitai

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@jagankumar-egov, how can I assist you today? If you have any specific requests or need help with something, please let me know!

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jagankumar-egov has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 43 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cc8cf59 and 7563944.

Walkthrough

The recent updates primarily focus on refining logging practices across various utility and API files. This includes removing redundant logs, enhancing message clarity using template literals, and introducing new debug logs for better traceability. Additionally, a new utility function for formatted debug strings was incorporated to standardize debug output.

Changes

Files/Paths	Change Summaries
.../campaignApis.ts	Removed some logging statements, added new ones for search initiation and validation, and updated others to use template literals.
.../campaignMappingUtils.ts	Added a new import for getFormattedStringForDebug and updated logging messages to use this function.
.../campaignUtils.ts	Modified logging messages for better clarity and added debug logs for formatted activities and mappings.
.../genericUtils.ts	Changed logging for facility generation to be more descriptive and added debug logging for facility response.
.../campaignValidators.ts	Added new logging for boundary data validation and updated existing logs to use the new debug formatting function.

Poem

In the code's vast, intricate land,
Logs now dance, clear and grand,
Debug strings formatted with care,
Errors find no place to snare.
With every change, clarity grows,
Through the logs, the truth now shows.
🌟🐰 Keep coding, where brilliance flows!

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[jagankumar-egov]

@coderabbitai
review this

[coderabbitai]

@jagankumar-egov, I've reviewed the changes in the file utilities/project-factory/src/server/api/campaignApis.ts as part of the pull request. Here are my observations and suggestions:

General Observations

• The file contains a variety of utility functions primarily focused on handling campaign data, facilities, and user data management.
• The changes seem to be well-structured, and the use of async functions and modular code enhances readability and maintainability.

Specific Observations

1. Logging: The use of the logger utility is consistent, which is good for debugging and tracking the flow of data. However, ensure that sensitive data is not being logged, especially in production environments.
2. Error Handling: The functions use a combination of throwing errors and logging, which is a robust approach. It might be beneficial to standardize the error messages and codes if not already done.
3. Code Comments: The comments are helpful and provide good context for the functions. It's important to keep these updated if the function logic changes in the future.

Suggestions

• Refactoring: Some functions are quite long and handle multiple tasks. Consider breaking these down into smaller, more focused functions to improve testability and clarity.
• Testing: Ensure that there are comprehensive unit tests covering various scenarios for these functions. This is crucial for functions that handle critical operations like confirmCreation and processCreate.

Conclusion

The updates to the logging appear to be appropriate and follow good practices. If there are specific areas within this file or others that you would like a deeper review on, such as security practices or performance optimizations, please let me know!

Analysis chain

---

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all files changed in the PR
git diff --name-only HEAD~1..HEAD

Length of output: 92

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Display the contents of the changed file
cat utilities/project-factory/src/server/api/campaignApis.ts

Length of output: 33820

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[coderabbitai]

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2bd4928 and cc8cf59.

Files selected for processing (5)

• utilities/project-factory/src/server/api/campaignApis.ts (8 hunks)
• utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignMappingUtils.ts (5 hunks)
• utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts (3 hunks)
• utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/genericUtils.ts (1 hunks)
• utilities/project-factory/src/server/validators/campaignValidators.ts (2 hunks)

 _____________________________________________________________
< Oompa Loompa doompadee doo, I've got a code review for you. >
 -------------------------------------------------------------
  \
   \   (\__/)
       (•ㅅ•)
       / 　 づ

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 6

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)

utilities/project-factory/src/server/api/campaignApis.ts (2)

Line range hint 270-285: Ensure that logging statements are not too verbose and do not log sensitive information such as mobile numbers directly.

- logger.info("Individual search to validate the mobile no initiated");
+ logger.debug("Individual search to validate the mobile no initiated");

---

Line range hint 516-557: Consider reducing the complexity of this function by breaking it down into smaller, more manageable functions.

- async function performAndSaveResourceActivity(request: any, createAndSearchConfig: any, params: any, type: any, localizationMap?: { [key: string]: string }) {
+ async function performAndSaveResourceActivity(request: any, createAndSearchConfig: any, params: any, type: any, localizationMap?: { [key: string]: string }) {
+   // Break down into smaller functions
+ }

utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/genericUtils.ts (5)

Line range hint 39-39: Specify a more precise type instead of any for error handling.

- const throwErrorViaRequest = (message: any = "Internal Server Error") => {
+ const throwErrorViaRequest = (message: string | { message?: string; code?: string; status?: number; description?: string } = "Internal Server  Error") => {

---

Line range hint 43-43: Use template literals for better readability and consistency.

- logger.error("Error : " + error + " " + (message?.description || ""));
+ logger.error(`Error : ${error} ${message?.description || ""}`);

---

Line range hint 46-51: This else clause is redundant and can be omitted for cleaner code.

- else {
-   let error: any = new Error(message);
-   error = Object.assign(error, { status: 500 });
-   logger.error("Error : " + error);
-   throw error;
- }

---

Line range hint 61-61: Use strict equality === for comparisons to avoid potential bugs.

- status = errorResult?.code == "UNKNOWN_ERROR" ? 500 : status;
+ status = errorResult?.code === "UNKNOWN_ERROR" ? 500 : status;

---

Line range hint 126-126: Convert string concatenations to template literals for consistency and readability.

- logger.info("CACHED RESPONSE FOR :: " + key);
+ logger.info(`CACHED RESPONSE FOR :: ${key}`);
- logger.info("CACHE STATUS :: " + JSON.stringify(appCache.getStats()));
- logger.info("RETURNS THE CACHED RESPONSE FOR :: " + key);
+ logger.info(`CACHE STATUS :: ${JSON.stringify(appCache.getStats())}`);
+ logger.info(`RETURNS THE CACHED RESPONSE FOR :: ${key}`);

Also applies to: 137-138

utilities/project-factory/src/server/validators/campaignValidators.ts (2)

Line range hint 28-28: Replace any type with more specific types.

Using any type can lead to runtime errors due to lack of type safety. Replace any with more specific types to enhance code robustness and maintainability.

Also applies to: 30-30, 38-38, 40-40, 43-43, 46-46, 53-53, 54-54, 63-63, 65-65, 68-68, 71-71

---

Line range hint 30-36: Replace forEach with for...of.

Using for...of loops can improve readability and performance in cases where asynchronous operations are involved inside the loop. Consider refactoring the forEach loops to for...of.

Also applies to: 46-49, 54-60, 71-74

utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts (4)

Line range hint 23-23: Replace any type with more specific types to improve type safety.

- function updateRange(range: any, desiredSheet: any) {
+ function updateRange(range: RangeType, desiredSheet: SheetType) {

Apply similar changes to other instances where any is used.

Also applies to: 40-40, 44-44, 57-57, 82-82, 82-82, 82-82, 82-82, 83-83, 89-89

---

Line range hint 70-70: Use template literals for string concatenation to improve readability and maintain consistency.

- logger.info("Updated Range : " + JSON.stringify(range))
+ logger.info(`Updated Range : ${JSON.stringify(range)}`)

Apply similar changes to other instances where string concatenation is used.

Also applies to: 74-74, 78-78

---

Line range hint 91-100: Prefer for...of loops over forEach for better performance and readability.

- errorData.forEach((error: any) => {
+ for (const error of errorData) {

Apply similar changes to other instances where forEach is used.

---

Line range hint 97-97: Use strict equality checks (===) instead of loose equality (==).

- if ((error?.status) && !(error?.status == "CREATED" || error?.status == "VALID")) {
+ if ((error?.status) && !(error?.status === "CREATED" || error?.status === "VALID")) {

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2bd4928 and cc8cf59.

Files selected for processing (5)

• utilities/project-factory/src/server/api/campaignApis.ts (8 hunks)
• utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignMappingUtils.ts (5 hunks)
• utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts (3 hunks)
• utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/genericUtils.ts (1 hunks)
• utilities/project-factory/src/server/validators/campaignValidators.ts (2 hunks)

Additional context used

Biome

utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignMappingUtils.ts

[error] 12-12: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 12-12: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 39-39: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 39-39: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 39-39: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 39-39: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 40-40: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 44-44: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 53-63: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

---

[error] 71-71: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 71-71: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 71-71: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 86-86: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 87-87: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 88-88: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 91-91: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 94-94: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 94-94: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 94-94: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

utilities/project-factory/src/server/api/campaignApis.ts

[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 28-28: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.

---

[error] 34-34: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 34-34: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 34-34: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 38-38: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.

---

[error] 40-43: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

---

[error] 52-52: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 65-65: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 83-83: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 83-83: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 85-85: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 96-96: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 114-114: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 114-114: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 116-116: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 138-138: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 138-138: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 158-158: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 158-158: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/genericUtils.ts

[error] 39-39: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 41-41: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 43-43: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 46-51: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

---

[error] 47-47: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 49-49: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 59-59: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 60-60: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 61-61: Use === instead of ==.
== is only allowed when comparing against null

---

[error] 62-62: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 69-69: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 69-69: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 85-85: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 103-103: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 105-105: This type annotation is trivially inferred from its initialization.

---

[error] 126-126: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 137-137: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 138-138: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 154-154: Use === instead of ==.
== is only allowed when comparing against null

---

[error] 162-162: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

utilities/project-factory/src/server/validators/campaignValidators.ts

[error] 28-28: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 28-28: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 28-28: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 30-36: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

---

[error] 30-30: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 38-38: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 40-40: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 43-43: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 46-49: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

---

[error] 46-46: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 53-53: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 53-53: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 53-53: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 54-60: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

---

[error] 54-54: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 63-63: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 65-65: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 68-68: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 71-74: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

---

[error] 71-71: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts

[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 40-40: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 44-44: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 57-57: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 70-70: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 74-74: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 78-78: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

---

[error] 82-82: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 82-82: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 82-82: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 82-82: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 83-83: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 89-89: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 91-100: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

---

[error] 91-91: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

---

[error] 97-97: Use === instead of ==.
== is only allowed when comparing against null

---

[error] 97-97: Use === instead of ==.
== is only allowed when comparing against null

---

[error] 106-112: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

---

[error] 106-106: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

Additional comments not posted (2)

utilities/project-factory/src/server/api/campaignApis.ts (1)

638-645: Ensure that the logging level is appropriate for the information being logged to avoid verbose output in production.

utilities/project-factory/src/server/validators/campaignValidators.ts (1)

832-832: Review debug logging for sensitive data.

Ensure that debug logs do not expose sensitive campaign details, especially in production environments.

[coderabbitai]

Tip

Codebase Verification

Ensure that logging levels are appropriate for the information being logged to avoid verbose output in production.

The search did not reveal any environment-specific configurations or conditions around the logger.info statements, indicating that these logs might be present in all environments, including production. This could lead to verbose output in production.

• File: utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignMappingUtils.ts
• Lines: 143-145

Consider adjusting the logging level to logger.debug for less critical information or adding environment checks to ensure that verbose logging is disabled in production.

Analysis chain

Ensure that logging levels are appropriate for the information being logged to avoid verbose output in production.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the logging level for project mapping initiation is set to debug in production environments.

# Test: Search for logger.info usage in production-related code sections.
rg --type typescript $'logger.info' | grep 'production'

Length of output: 87

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the logging level for project mapping initiation is set to debug in production environments.

# Test: Search for logger.info usage in TypeScript files.
rg --type ts 'logger.info'

Length of output: 18955

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the logging level for project mapping initiation is set to debug in production environments.

# Test: Search for environment-specific configurations or conditions around logger.info statements.
rg --type ts 'logger.info' -A 5 -B 5 | grep -i 'env\|production\|process.env'

Length of output: 577