HLM 6210

[nabeelmd-eGov]

• HLM-6210: campaign type change reset delivery data fix, summary error focus fix
• summary error focus fix
• parallel search fixes

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in useParallelSearch.js introduce a new function, checkParentCodePresence, which checks for the presence of parent codes in a data array. This function is integrated into an existing conditional statement to ensure data is conditionally removed based on both length comparison and parent code presence.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useParallelSearch.js	Added checkParentCodePresence function to verify parent code presence and modified a conditional statement to use this function.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant useParallelSearch
    participant checkParentCodePresence
    participant cacheData

    User->>useParallelSearch: Invoke search
    useParallelSearch->>cacheData: Access targetedData
    useParallelSearch->>checkParentCodePresence: Check parent code presence in data
    checkParentCodePresence-->>useParallelSearch: Return boolean result
    useParallelSearch->>cacheData: Conditionally remove data based on length and parent code presence
    cacheData-->>useParallelSearch: Return final data
    useParallelSearch-->>User: Provide search results

Loading

Poem

In the realm of code so bright,
New functions bring delight,
Check parent codes, we must,
To ensure our data's trust.
With changes swift and keen,
Our searches now more clean.
Hoppy code, so serene! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useParallelSearch.js (1)

36-38: Add a function description for checkParentCodePresence.

It's good practice to include a brief comment describing what this function does, its parameters, and what it returns. This enhances code readability and maintainability.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d5c0dd and 61af692.

Files selected for processing (1)

• micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useParallelSearch.js (2 hunks)

Additional context used

Path-based instructions (1)

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useParallelSearch.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

Biome

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useParallelSearch.js

[error] 54-54: Unsafe usage of optional chaining. (lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)

If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:

---

[error] 57-85: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.

---

[error] 62-85: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)

---

[error] 68-85: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)

---

[error] 82-82: Unsafe usage of optional chaining. (lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)

If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:

Additional comments not posted (2)

micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useParallelSearch.js (2)

Line range hint 82-82: Verify the safety of optional chaining usage.

Similar to the previous comment, ensure that cacheData?.targetedData is always defined before this operation, or handle the potential 'undefined' case explicitly.

Verification successful

---

The search results indicate that cacheData is initialized as an object from session storage in the useParallelSearch hook. The optional chaining on cacheData?.targetedData is used multiple times in the same file, suggesting that targetedData might not always be defined.

To ensure the safety of optional chaining usage, it is crucial to handle cases where targetedData might be undefined. The current implementation already uses optional chaining, which safely handles undefined values without throwing errors.

• micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useParallelSearch.js: let cacheData = window.Digit.SessionStorage.get("HCM_CAMPAIGN_BOUNDARY_DATA") ? window.Digit.SessionStorage.get("HCM_CAMPAIGN_BOUNDARY_DATA") : {};

Given this context, the usage of optional chaining appears to be safe and appropriate.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of `cacheData` and `targetedData`.

# Test: Search for the initialization of `cacheData` and `targetedData`. Expect: Proper initialization before usage.
rg --type javascript $'cacheData?.targetedData'

Length of output: 83

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization and usage of `cacheData` and `targetedData`.

# Search for the initialization and usage of `cacheData`.
rg 'cacheData'

# Search for the initialization and usage of `targetedData`.
rg 'targetedData'

Length of output: 9438

---

54-54: Verify the safety of optional chaining usage.

There's a potential issue with unsafe optional chaining that might lead to a TypeError if it short-circuits with 'undefined'. Please ensure that cacheData?.[targetedData] is always defined before this operation, or handle the potential 'undefined' case explicitly.

Verification successful

---

The search results indicate that cacheData is initialized as follows:

let cacheData = window.Digit.SessionStorage.get("HCM_CAMPAIGN_BOUNDARY_DATA") ? window.Digit.SessionStorage.get("HCM_CAMPAIGN_BOUNDARY_DATA") : {};

This initialization ensures that cacheData is always an object, either retrieved from session storage or as an empty object if nothing is found in session storage.

Additionally, targetedData is passed as a parameter to the useParallelSearch function:

const useParallelSearch = async ({ parentArray, tenantId, boundaryType, hierarchy, targetedData }) => {

Given this context, the usage of optional chaining with cacheData?.[targetedData] is safe because cacheData is always defined as an object. The optional chaining is used to safely access properties of cacheData that may or may not exist, which is the intended use of optional chaining.

• cacheData is always initialized as an object.
• targetedData is passed as a parameter and used to access properties of cacheData.

Therefore, the optional chaining usage in the code is safe and does not pose a risk of a TypeError.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of `cacheData` and `targetedData`.

# Test: Search for the initialization of `cacheData` and `targetedData`. Expect: Proper initialization before usage.
rg --type javascript $'cacheData?.\[targetedData\]'

Length of output: 87

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of `cacheData` and `targetedData`.

# Test: Search for the initialization of `cacheData` and `targetedData`. Expect: Proper initialization before usage.
rg 'cacheData' --type js
rg 'targetedData' --type js

Length of output: 8779

Tools

Biome

[error] 54-54: Unsafe usage of optional chaining. (lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)

If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:

[coderabbitai]

Consider removing unnecessary else clauses.

The else clause here can be omitted for cleaner code, as the previous branches return early. This would make the code more readable and reduce nesting.

-  } else if (cacheData?.[targetedData]?.length > parentArray?.length && checkParentCodePresence(cacheData?.[targetedData], parentArray)) {
+  if (cacheData?.[targetedData]?.length > parentArray?.length && checkParentCodePresence(cacheData?.[targetedData], parentArray)) {

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	} else if (cacheData?.[targetedData]?.length > parentArray?.length && checkParentCodePresence(cacheData?.[targetedData], parentArray)) {
	if (cacheData?.[targetedData]?.length > parentArray?.length && checkParentCodePresence(cacheData?.[targetedData], parentArray)) {

Tools

Biome

[error] 57-85: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.