Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fleet] Tests for the Agent restructure / symlink work #21023

Closed
EricDavisX opened this issue Sep 8, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

[Fleet] Tests for the Agent restructure / symlink work #21023

EricDavisX opened this issue Sep 8, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@EricDavisX
Copy link
Contributor

EricDavisX commented Sep 8, 2020

In this PR we had some test questions, since it is closed I'd like to open an issue for testing and automation work and track it here:
#20400 (comment)

@michalpristas can you make sure any changes that break the e2e-testing are fixed?

@rahulgupta-qasource we can use this as a running tally of questions + tests. I'll seed the list with what questions we had from the pr.

Queries:

Could you please let us know if we have to validate the above packages on 7.9.2-SNAPSHOT or 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT also.

  • It was not backported to 7.9.2, so no testing needed there.
  • 8.0 is a valid code base to test against, but we need not do this. Once thru is ok.

Could you please share the exact steps to execute the upgrade/rollback scenarios (say as per comment #20400 (review) , #20400 (comment) and #20400 (comment) )
Please let us know if we are missing something to validate this ticket or need to add any other validation scenario.

  • I think the UI side is not implemented yet, so it isn't testable. If / when it is we can do so and Engg can confirm when all moving / needed parts are merged and backported. Thanks.
@EricDavisX EricDavisX assigned michalpristas and ghost Sep 8, 2020
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Sep 8, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/ingest-management (Team:Ingest Management)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Sep 8, 2020
@ph
Copy link
Contributor

ph commented Sep 8, 2020

The upgrade / rollback scenario aren't implemented yet, its still a work in progress.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 9, 2020

Hi @EricDavisX / @ph

Thank you for sharing the feedback.

Please keep us posted once upgrade / rollback scenarios are implemented and share the exact steps to validate the same.

@ph
Copy link
Contributor

ph commented Oct 14, 2020

@EricDavisX I believe this could be closed?

@ph ph added the v7.10.0 label Oct 14, 2020
@EricDavisX
Copy link
Contributor Author

EricDavisX commented Oct 14, 2020

I was confused on which core focus this issue was. It is about the re-testing of Agent install. It is confirmed as implemented and works well in many cases. There are open issues and questions we are tackling and they are all logged separately. So, yes, lets close this out.

@EricDavisX
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rahulgupta-qasource about the upgrade-agent cases, it is testable and we will track that separately as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants