Cherry-pick #13016 to 7.x: [Heartbeat] Whitelist --index-management flag for heartbeat #13042
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…13016) * [Heartbeat] Whitelist --index-management flag for heartbeat We received a bug report on [discuss](https://discuss.elastic.co/t/heartbeat-7-2-0-error-unknown-flag-index-management/191670) about this key being missing. It should have been added with elastic#11856 but was missed. * Deprecate old keys (cherry picked from commit d43ec5e)
|
Test failures are unrelated |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of PR #13016 to 7.x branch. Original message:
We received a bug report on discuss about this key being missing. It should have been added with #11856 but was missed.
I haven't added tests here because this code is already very declarative. We mostly want to test the presence of this feature, not its implementation. While that has value here, the effort/benefit ratio here feels to me like something we can skip, which is what we did for @ruflin 's original PR.