Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create room 1 and 2: Room creation flow to be improved #1756

Closed
bradlegge opened this issue Jul 12, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

Create room 1 and 2: Room creation flow to be improved #1756

bradlegge opened this issue Jul 12, 2016 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@bradlegge
Copy link

bradlegge commented Jul 12, 2016

Create room 1 and 2: Room creation flow to be improved

Dependency/question: functionality does not exist - Vector or ribot team to create?

original requirements from Amandine

We've been getting feedback from the users which confirmed our experience that the room creation flow is not great.

Today we get into an empty room and the focus in on the invite field. Which makes people invite others in a name-less room. And there is no mean to cancel the creation except by leaving the room.

We’re thinking that a 2 stage creation flow would be (was) better there are steps through which people should be going before inviting: set a room name and potentially a topic.
An idea was to open a an empty room but with a modal popup (or possibly the room settings pane open? But they’re scary today) for the user to fill in the room name and possibly a topic, and visibility/privacy settings. Then once pressing OK the room is created and focus is on invite field.

What do you think? Any other thoughts to improve the experience?

@bradlegge bradlegge added X-Needs-Info This issue is blocked awaiting information from the reporter rs1 labels Jul 12, 2016
@AmandineLP
Copy link
Contributor

Please define "functionality".
This is updating the "Create room" flow, redirecting to a reduced version of the current room settings when clicking on "Create a new room" button in the bottom left corner.
It's the same screen as the room settings, albeit with a better design and only part of the settings.

@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Jul 12, 2016

To clarify: we do have a create room component already, but it looks nothing like Trevor's new design. A new one will need to be created, sharing much of the functionality with the current Room Settings page. It would be great if this could be done on the Ribot side (although this one is pretty much all coding rather than design).

I'd prioritise the more fiddly cosmetics over this one and do it if we have time, as this can always be done on the Vector side, whereas the HTML+CSS wrangling is at more of a premium.

@bradlegge bradlegge removed the X-Needs-Info This issue is blocked awaiting information from the reporter label Jul 14, 2016
@bradlegge bradlegge changed the title Create room 1: implement new subsettings Create room 1 and 2: Room creation flow to be improved Jul 14, 2016
@bradlegge bradlegge added rs2 and removed rs1 labels Jul 27, 2016
@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Sep 1, 2016

Signed off as a style sheet - not to be taken as literal form contents though

...with the exception that we need to work out where to put the save button in the event of the form being taller than one page.

@ara4n ara4n added the design label Sep 1, 2016
@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Sep 8, 2016

...now solved in https://zpl.io/1hf7ar. signed off!

@ara4n ara4n assigned dbkr and unassigned antikewl and bradlegge Sep 13, 2016
@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Sep 13, 2016

We're going for a short-term fix in #2178 for now...

@lampholder lampholder removed the rs2 label Feb 27, 2019
@t3chguy
Copy link
Member

t3chguy commented Dec 23, 2019

Room Creation flow is vastly improved and further improvements scoped to Nad's design

@t3chguy t3chguy closed this as completed Dec 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants