Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate support for Travis CI #855

Closed
bertdeblock opened this issue Oct 1, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Deprecate support for Travis CI #855

bertdeblock opened this issue Oct 1, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@bertdeblock
Copy link
Member

Wondering if Travis CI is still (widely) used across the ecosystem and if we should drop support for it.
I can't find many hits on emberobserver.com.

Thoughts?

@acorncom
Copy link
Contributor

acorncom commented Oct 1, 2022

I think dropping support for it would be wise, believe Heroku getting hacked had to do with security issues at Travis 3+ months ago

@chriskrycho
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, agreed. Sad story but at this point the rest of it only gets sadder as far as I can see.

@sandstrom
Copy link
Contributor

We've never used it. My hunch is that a lot of projects are moving to Github Actions.

Deprecating support won't make it impossible to use Travis CI either, so people can still use it if they want to. I guess this is mostly about removing some default files related to Travis?

@wagenet
Copy link
Member

wagenet commented Dec 7, 2022

@bertdeblock do you want to write this RFC?

@bertdeblock
Copy link
Member Author

@wagenet This was briefly discussed during one of the previous CLI meetings and the outcome was that it's not a priority and that some people might still be using Travis CI happily (only speculation of course). But I might end up writing a small RFC nonetheless, I may have some time in the coming weeks.

@bertdeblock
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #918.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants