You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For libraries, it may be beneficial to include code snippets or migration paths, tips, examples, etc in the changelog.
With changesets, this was the main draw -- with release-it, release-plan / everything else, you have to manage that level of detail separately -- but I think it'd be good to have some sort of opt-in... maybe via label (changelog-use-description) or something to include this level of details.
otherwise, you have to remember all that context during changelog creation time as you edit the preview PR before merge.
thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Personally I think having a title is enough here. The fact that we keep a link to the PR so people can go and look at the description is more than enough 👍
while that may be true, and a good default, I can see maintainers wanting more thorough changelogs. one demographic that would be interested in this use case are the folks currently using changesets.
For libraries, it may be beneficial to include code snippets or migration paths, tips, examples, etc in the changelog.
With changesets, this was the main draw -- with release-it, release-plan / everything else, you have to manage that level of detail separately -- but I think it'd be good to have some sort of opt-in... maybe via label (changelog-use-description) or something to include this level of details.
otherwise, you have to remember all that context during changelog creation time as you edit the preview PR before merge.
thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: