Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/stylesheets/landing.css 404 #64

Open
andrew-pickin-epi opened this issue Oct 13, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

/stylesheets/landing.css 404 #64

andrew-pickin-epi opened this issue Oct 13, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@andrew-pickin-epi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Further there is nothing that report or alerts this as an error.

@ijdickinson
Copy link
Contributor

Unclear to me what the ask is here. From what I can tell, a client app had a reference to an out-of-date landing.css stylesheet. When the apps are updated, old versions that are cached in browsers might end up with stale references, which 404 when the user interacts with the app. The stale ref should clear when the user refreshes the page.

Further there is nothing that report or alerts this as an error.

I'm not sure if you're saying that it alert and it shouldn't (because it's just a 404), or that it didn't alert and it should have (which I'm not sure I agree with, since there's nothing we can do about stale cached copies of the app)

@andrew-pickin-epi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, if this is a stale deployment then so be it but I though this was a new deployment I'm not sure how anything stale got deployed here.

@andrew-pickin-epi
Copy link
Contributor Author

{"level":"ERROR","ts":"2021-11-02T16:04:57.269Z","request_id":"YYFhqXEOYaxosIUsj1N-JAAAAAw","message":"ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches [GET] "/stylesheets/landing.css"):","rails":{"environment":"production"}}

Ok I've just recreated. Doesn't thins indicate that the current deployment of the landing image has reference to a non-existent css file?
Even if this isn't the case but one of those things "that just might happen" then it's not a ERROR.

@ijdickinson
Copy link
Contributor

Ok I've just recreated. Doesn't thins indicate that the current deployment of the landing image has reference to a non-existent css file?

It does look that way (or, at least, it's the wrong path to a file that does exist). @bogdanadrianmarc Can you please investigate.

Even if this isn't the case but one of those things "that just might happen" then it's not a ERROR.

I agree. I thought we had added something to json_rails_logger to change the level if it was reporting a 404. Again, one for Bogdan to look at.

@mika018
Copy link
Contributor

mika018 commented Nov 23, 2021

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants