We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, we remove "Revert" commits from the blog posts, this unit tests seems to indicated that's a correct behavior:
eslint-release/tests/lib/release-ops.js
Line 147 in 6e4bd2d
If revert happens a different release then original commit, we should probably show it in blog post.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
we should probably show it in blog post
While excluding it from version calculation, yes?
Sorry, something went wrong.
I think so. I don't think we should ever include "revert" into version calculation.
No branches or pull requests
Currently, we remove "Revert" commits from the blog posts, this unit tests seems to indicated that's a correct behavior:
eslint-release/tests/lib/release-ops.js
Line 147 in 6e4bd2d
If revert happens a different release then original commit, we should probably show it in blog post.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: