You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Bucket life-cycle policies remove data -- that means, if I create a materialization for a collection after the fact, I will never see as many documents read as have been written, and a % completion metric can never be accurate. This seems a likely potential source of confusion.
Is this really just a larger grain of time than "month"? "year"?
If we introduce a "compaction" feature for a collection, that also could reduce the number of docs / bytes I need to actually read -- though compaction can likely be framed as a truncation, which makes them the same problem.
These smell a bit like guages (rather than countesr) that are tracked and reported by tasks -- "I've captured this many docs / bytes since the binding was last truncated" or "I've read this many docs / bytes since I last saw a truncation for this binding"
Goal
Understand how a data flow is progressing and whether / how much a materialization is behind a capture.
Proposal
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: