Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting #110 #355

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
poojaranjan opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting #110 #355

poojaranjan opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member

poojaranjan commented May 23, 2023

Date and Time

June 06, 2023 at 14:00 UTC [Please note the change of meeting time]

Location

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84834303064?pwd=YTVDNUxvSjEzL1VTOXNoNmI1a2RlZz09
Video at YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD9iiIwTRtLDYcEWONs2Q3A

Agenda

New users on ECH Discord and/or contributor's introduction

1. Ethereum network upgrades

Useful resources

Other Protocol Development & Research

2. Events, Fellowship, Hackathon

3. General updates/discussion

4. New initiative/association

  • Update ECH access
    • Discord,
    • Twitter,
    • Medium
  • Contributors to send weekly Tweets or repost on social media to increase reach
  • Any new ideas for community engagement?

5. Review of outstanding action items from previous ECH meetings

The date for the next meeting is June 20, 2023

(If anything else, leave a comment.)

@pcaversaccio
Copy link

I have continually documented in the (currently closed) EIP-6269 why it is relevant to reconsider this, and numerous people have also shown support, e.g. on Twitter (I have linked some of them) & @xinbenlv also can see my arguments why it is important (see his comments here). I kindly ask you to reconsider your decision as I really think it is wrong to close this important, definitional EIP.

@xinbenlv
Copy link
Contributor

I have continually documented in the (currently closed) EIP-6269 why it is relevant to reconsider this, and numerous people have also shown support, e.g. on Twitter (I have linked some of them) & @xinbenlv also can see my arguments why it is important (see his comments here). I kindly ask you to reconsider your decision as I really think it is wrong to close this important, definitional EIP.

Yes, given the context of zkEVM, I think it's worthy to reopen this discussion about defining what's considered "EVM compliance"

Also we shall discuss it to be whether an informational or meta EIP?

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

@pcaversaccio
Just for you to know, EIP editors decide to merge or not merge a proposal to the EIPs repository. Should you want to discuss this proposal with them, my recommendation will be to add a comment to the EIPIP meeting Agenda. If possible, join the meeting; if not, leave an explanation.

@pcaversaccio
Copy link

@pcaversaccio Just for you to know, EIP editors decide to merge or not merge a proposal to the EIPs repository. Should you want to discuss this proposal with them, my recommendation will be to add a comment to the EIPIP meeting Agenda. If possible, join the meeting; if not, leave an explanation.

Thanks! I added it to the agenda with an explanation.

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #358

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants