We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://github.com/ethereum/web3.js/blob/441c309d3304ffbc36fca4ef483adf314b5f4801/packages/web3-eth-contract/src/factories/ContractModuleFactory.js#L41-L49
https://github.com/ethereum/web3.js/blob/441c309d3304ffbc36fca4ef483adf314b5f4801/packages/web3-eth-contract/src/index.js#L49
I came across this because my IDE is screaming at me "This makes no sense" (static code analysis):
Should not be very difficult to add some sort of static code analysis for this kind of stuff.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@levino Yes, I think accounts is unnecessary parameter over there. we will remove it.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
https://github.com/ethereum/web3.js/blob/441c309d3304ffbc36fca4ef483adf314b5f4801/packages/web3-eth-contract/src/factories/ContractModuleFactory.js#L41-L49
https://github.com/ethereum/web3.js/blob/441c309d3304ffbc36fca4ef483adf314b5f4801/packages/web3-eth-contract/src/index.js#L49
I came across this because my IDE is screaming at me "This makes no sense" (static code analysis):
Should not be very difficult to add some sort of static code analysis for this kind of stuff.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: