-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: prefer jest.require* instead of require.require* #7210
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome!
docs/GlobalAPI.md
Outdated
@@ -434,11 +434,11 @@ test('will be ran', () => { | |||
}); | |||
``` | |||
|
|||
### `require.requireActual(moduleName)` | |||
### `jest.requireActual(moduleName)` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have a separate "jest object" doc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
gonna move it there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
awesome!
changelog, perhaps?
Of course, how could I forget 😅 |
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Summary
Use
jest.requireActual
andjest.requireMock
in the docs and our own tests.A step forward to deprecate
require.requireActual
andrequire.requireMock
.Test plan
Both APIs should work for now.