Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2018. It is now read-only.

Changes required due to TextBuffer.save becoming async in Atom 1.19 #1198

Closed
maxbrunsfeld opened this issue Jun 14, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@maxbrunsfeld
Copy link

maxbrunsfeld commented Jun 14, 2017

Hey Nuclide team!

As I've mentioned to some of you, in Atom v1.19, we will release a major change to Atom's core text buffer data structure. As part of this change, we have made TextBuffer.save asynchronous; rather than blocking until the save is complete, it now immediately returns a Promise that resolves when the save is complete. Because of this, a few other Atom APIs that use save have similarly become async:

  • Pane.close
  • TextBuffer.save
  • TextEditor.save
  • Pane.saveItem
  • Pane.saveItemAs
  • Pane.saveActiveItem
  • Pane.saveActiveItemAs
  • Pane.saveItems
  • Workspace.saveActivePaneItem
  • Workspace.saveActivePaneItemAs

Effects on this package

We think this package could be impacted by this upgrade because it calls the changed methods in the following places:

We found these calls using a regex search, so this list might be incomplete, and it might contain some false positives.

What to do about the change

It should be pretty easy to adjust your package code and/or tests to work with the new async behavior, and to simultaneously keep it working with older versions of Atom. Here are some examples of pull requests we opened on our bundled packages to cope with the change:

Let me know if you have any questions. I'd be happy to help!

@hansonw
Copy link
Contributor

hansonw commented Jul 26, 2017

Thanks @maxbrunsfeld! Our remote editors have always had a custom async save so this particular piece is pretty painless. We're now using the new APIs in 1.19 so hopefully this is good to go :)

@hansonw hansonw closed this as completed Jul 26, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants