Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2024. It is now read-only.

With AutoAugment(RandAugment) or CutMix ? #112

Open
ildoonet opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

With AutoAugment(RandAugment) or CutMix ? #112

ildoonet opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@ildoonet
Copy link

I have tried to train RegNet variants with strong augmentations, such as AutoAugment or CutMix.

But the performance can not be improved with them.

For example, I have reproduced the paper's result for RegNet-Y-400M but I got around top1 accuracy 69% with CutMix, which is way below the vanilla RegNet-Y-400M.

I also tried to train the RegNet-Y with longer epochs, but failed to improve the result.

Do you have any experience for the strong data augmentations?

@ir413
Copy link
Contributor

ir413 commented Sep 14, 2020

Hi @ildoonet, thanks for sharing your findings. I don't have experience with strong data augmentations myself. However, we heard that several groups have managed to achieve strong results with RegNets using improved training settings (e.g. RegNetY-3.2GF with 82.0 top-1 accuracy reported here). So I believe that some combination of stronger settings should be able to give you better results. We also plan to release models with stronger settings in the future.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants