Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accept dates as params for Date methods #198

Closed
pkuczynski opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #200
Closed

Accept dates as params for Date methods #198

pkuczynski opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #200
Assignees
Labels
c: bug Something isn't working p: 1-normal Nothing urgent s: accepted Accepted feature / Confirmed bug

Comments

@pkuczynski
Copy link
Member

pkuczynski commented Jan 17, 2022

Describe the bug

Old faker used to support dates for functions like faker.date.past or faker.date.between. New types do not allow such calls.

Reproduction

const baseDate = new Date()

faker.past(1, baseDate)

Additional Info

No response

@pkuczynski pkuczynski added the s: pending triage Pending Triage label Jan 17, 2022
@pkuczynski pkuczynski changed the title Accept dates as params for Date methods fix: accept dates as params for Date methods Jan 17, 2022
@pkuczynski pkuczynski changed the title fix: accept dates as params for Date methods Accept dates as params for Date methods Jan 17, 2022
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 added the c: bug Something isn't working label Jan 17, 2022
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 added this to the v6.1.0 milestone Jan 17, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the s: pending triage Pending Triage label Jan 17, 2022
@ST-DDT ST-DDT added p: 1-normal Nothing urgent s: accepted Accepted feature / Confirmed bug labels Mar 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c: bug Something isn't working p: 1-normal Nothing urgent s: accepted Accepted feature / Confirmed bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants
@pkuczynski @ST-DDT @Shinigami92 and others