You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are certain scenarios where forward modelling the magnetic effect of layers is meaningful (e.g. topography).
It seems that prism_layer can be used to define these layers and perhaps even assign magnetic properties, however there does not appear to be a mag equivalent to prism_gravity to perform the forward operation for the magnetic field.
I can think of some things that would be needed, including:
harmonica.prism_magnetic, jit_prism_magnetic, and new kernels for different mag fields that would need inducing field parameters
magnetic() defined in DatasetAccessorPrismLayer so that prism_layer.magnetic could call harmonica.prism_magnetic
new constants defined
changes to the dispatcher to account for gravity or mag
Are you willing to help implement and maintain this feature?
Happy to help where I can, probably best suited to testing though!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The good news is that we are working on it. All the kernels for the magnetic fields of prisms and dipoles live in Choclo and I've started a PR for adding magnetic forward modelling functions for prisms (see #369).
I think @aguspesce will start working on adding a magnetic_field method to the prism layer accessor so we can easily compute the magnetic field of a layer of prisms.
We'll be glad if you would like to contribute! Is there anything that you would like to start working on?
Description of the desired feature:
There are certain scenarios where forward modelling the magnetic effect of layers is meaningful (e.g. topography).
It seems that prism_layer can be used to define these layers and perhaps even assign magnetic properties, however there does not appear to be a mag equivalent to prism_gravity to perform the forward operation for the magnetic field.
I can think of some things that would be needed, including:
DatasetAccessorPrismLayer
so that prism_layer.magnetic could call harmonica.prism_magneticdispatcher
to account for gravity or magAre you willing to help implement and maintain this feature?
Happy to help where I can, probably best suited to testing though!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: