You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For an alpha release, we should reliably handle 150 concurrent users. Peak FECFile usage could be over 5,000 concurrent users
As a [role], I will be able to [blank] so that I can [business reason]
Acceptance Criteria
If [precedent] When [action] Then [result]
Dev notes
Current average response time for 150 concurrent users is over 3 seconds (3,000-4,000ms), and that's just for read queries, not for writes. Also, there's very little data in the system. Ideally, that should be under 500ms with over 100,000 rows of data
Results from running 3 application instances, 1.5GB
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lbeaufort
changed the title
Application can perform with 150 concurrent users and over 100,000 rows of data
Application should perform well with 150 concurrent users and over 100,000 rows of data
Mar 12, 2024
Business Reason
For an alpha release, we should reliably handle 150 concurrent users. Peak FECFile usage could be over 5,000 concurrent users
As a [role], I will be able to [blank] so that I can [business reason]
Acceptance Criteria
If [precedent] When [action] Then [result]
Dev notes
Current average response time for 150 concurrent users is over 3 seconds (3,000-4,000ms), and that's just for read queries, not for writes. Also, there's very little data in the system. Ideally, that should be under 500ms with over 100,000 rows of data
Results from running 3 application instances, 1.5GB
QA Notes
null
DEV Notes
null
Design
null
See full ticket and images here: FECFILE-210
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: