[Storage Provider Bounty Issue] Deal processing Storage Provider on Calibration network #323

flyworker · 2021-09-29T21:57:34Z

This issue is designed as a collaborative project!

5 individual contributors (3 from EU/U.S and 2 from Asia) will be chosen as a team assigned for this issue
Each contributors is required to perform their tasks for 3 months in order to satisfy the requirements of this issue
The total rewards will be divided for each contributors where each individual contributors will receive $500USD/month

Please leave a comment if you are interested to participate in this bounty issue

1. Proposed issue:

We noticed that since the development increased in deal market, more and more teams test their solution on calibration network. Have storage providers on calibration network will help the ecosystem development.

2. Why is this issue important?

As a ecosystem developer, it is too expensive to testing everything on mainnet, we also want to test the deal working on different lotus versions.

Without the calibration storage provider node, it is hard to perform a low cost testing.
It brings the advantage for eco devs:

Saved time for find a storage provider on mainnet environment
Early test their projects
Focus on product instead of infrastructure
Performance testing

3. Tasks

Storage providers need to provider as least two versions of lotus miner

latest version
latest released version

Share logs with developers

4. Additional Context

Some extra work may need to be done:

Reservation system for user access
Rotate bounties every 3 months for community volunteers

dayou5168 · 2021-10-13T02:49:28Z

@flyworker Are there more specific requirements, such as the sealing efficiency of SP per day?

Fatman13 · 2021-10-13T08:18:56Z

Are Venus nodes allowed to participate? Current venus-market is compatible with Lotus wrt deals.

Fatman13 · 2021-10-13T08:20:10Z

Also what is "Reservation system for user access"? Does that mean we need to provide access to our provider to 3rd party?

flyworker · 2021-10-14T00:04:14Z

@dayou5168 For FilSwan we do not do performance testing on calibration, it is more for functional test, so 2 deals per day is good enough. For other projects they may have different requirement.

@Fatman13 We are using standard lotus so if it is compatible with lotus command it should be fine,.

Fatman13 · 2021-10-15T06:55:15Z

@flyworker How long are deals expected to live for?

flyworker · 2021-10-15T12:41:06Z

maybe one week? we dont need it stay long, since it is only used for UAT(user acceptance test)

cryptowhizzard · 2021-10-15T20:48:50Z

I am interested in this one, however when I have to put some hardware up and storage I guess the reward of 500 usd per month Is a bit on the low side.

PatHoo · 2021-11-04T01:33:50Z

I want to join it.

vnessasgrt · 2021-11-04T02:56:13Z

@cryptowhizzard If you are still interested in this project, please let me know
@PatHoo Great! Which region are you based in?

PatHoo · 2021-11-04T03:00:00Z

@cryptowhizzard If you are still interested in this project, please let me know @PatHoo Great! Which region are you based in?

Canton China

nobsu · 2021-11-04T03:48:18Z

i want to join

vnessasgrt · 2021-11-04T03:51:47Z

Which region are you based in?

i want to join

cryptowhizzard · 2021-11-04T07:30:15Z

@vnessasgrt yes I am still interested.

cloudxin · 2021-11-05T01:54:38Z

I want to participate . The location is China

flyworker · 2021-11-08T14:27:46Z

t024557 , 32GB is online now for NA-EAST region

Fatman13 · 2021-11-15T09:57:43Z

@flyworker the program has started?

cryptowhizzard · 2021-11-16T13:07:01Z

t025478, 32 GB is now online for EU-West ( Amsterdam ).

cloudxin · 2021-11-19T05:47:39Z

t019411 , 32GB is online now for NA-EAS region

vnessasgrt · 2022-01-06T01:25:24Z

Due to the time limitation, we are going to lock this bounty on 4 contributors. @flyworker @cloudxin @nobsu @PatHoo
Bounty duration: Jan 6,2022 - March 6,2022 (3 months)
Please attach your Miner ID to confirm the progress of this project.

cloudxin · 2022-01-06T03:28:49Z

@vnessasgrt For the sake of security, I hope to get your export public network address and place an order address, so that your deal machine will be allowed to access in my security group, and the provider will only receive your orders

vnessasgrt · 2022-01-06T15:04:33Z

@vnessasgrt For the sake of security, I hope to get your export public network address and place an order address, so that your deal machine will be allowed to access in my security group, and the provider will only receive your orders

Calibration nodes should be accessible to our community members since it is a test for the community and not for one particular entity.

cloudxin · 2022-01-07T03:10:25Z

OK, you can send the order

nobsu · 2022-01-07T10:15:39Z

32GB，in Singapore， Node is coming soon

PatHoo · 2022-01-07T11:18:30Z

Miner: t029862 (32 GiB sectors), in Canton, IP-Port: 47.57.112.121:8888

PatHoo · 2022-01-07T12:27:38Z

hkc@NODE-091:/data-u2/FIL$ lotus state miner-info t029862
Available Balance: 3.587788923723298021 FIL
Owner:  t029859
Worker: t029859
PeerID: 12D3KooWHVsJzA9hmHUjtnfMXxxKMXs3iUKPqJMKkFjbErzb5Cym
Multiaddrs:     /ip4/47.57.112.121/tcp/8888 
Consensus Fault End:    -1
SectorSize:     32 GiB (34359738368)
Byte Power:   0 B / 1.599 PiB (0.0000%)
Actual Power: 0  / 2.23 Pi (0.0000%)

Proving Period Start:   582525 (6 hours 2 minutes ago)

hkc@NODE-072:/data-u2/FIL$ lotus-miner storage-deals get-ask t029862
Price per GiB/Epoch  Verified           Min. Piece Size (padded)  Max. Piece Size (padded)  Expiry (Epoch)  Expiry (Appx. Rem. Time)  Seq. No.
0.0000000005 FIL     0.00000000005 FIL  256 B                     32 GiB                    1581956         8322h34m0s                0

nobsu · 2022-01-11T04:18:38Z

32GB，in Singapore， Node is coming soon

lotus client query-ask t030087
Ask: t030087
Price per GiB: 0.0000000005 FIL
Verified Price per GiB: 0.00000000005 FIL
Max Piece size: 32 GiB
Min Piece size: 256 B

flyworker · 2022-01-13T01:05:37Z

t024557 is working
Adjusted Power: 2.7188 TiB
Price (GiB/epoch): 0.000000001000000000 FIL
Score ?: 96
Max Piece Size: 32.0 GiB
Price (32GiB/year): 0.016819199999999999 FIL
Status: Active
Min Piece Size: 256.0 Byte
Verified Price (GiB/epoch): 0.000000000050000000 FIL
Location: North America
Auto Bid: Yes
Heart Beat: Online

cloudxin · 2022-01-17T02:33:43Z

@vnessasgrt I have never received your order, my calibration network miner number is f019411

flyworker · 2022-01-18T02:43:54Z

f019411

Is f019411 a mainet id? I think testnet should start with 't'

cloudxin · 2022-01-18T04:14:48Z

It's from the test network. It doesn't distinguish whether it starts with 'f' or 't'. Miner information can be queried

flyworker · 2022-01-18T23:29:26Z

cloudxin · 2022-01-19T07:22:34Z

I have tested on the lotus node remotely, and there is no problem. I want to know the reason for this error report

longfeiWan9 · 2022-03-18T07:51:34Z

@vnessasgrt May I ask what the status of this Bounty program is? I have tried to query-ask a couple of storage providers here without any luck. So I am wondering if they are still accepting storage deals on Calibration network for testing purposes.
The miners I have tried to query ask:

t029862 - shutdown @PatHoo
Bounty duration: Jan 6,2022 - March 6,2022 (3 months)
t019411 - @cloudxin
t024557 - @flyworker
t030087 - @@nobsu

PatHoo · 2022-03-18T12:38:00Z

I shutdown t029862 a few days ago.

flyworker assigned vnessasgrt Sep 29, 2021

vnessasgrt added the bounty this issue has a bounty label Oct 11, 2021

vnessasgrt assigned flyworker and PatHoo Nov 4, 2021

vnessasgrt assigned cryptowhizzard and cloudxin Nov 5, 2021

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[Storage Provider Bounty Issue] Deal processing Storage Provider on Calibration network #323

[Storage Provider Bounty Issue] Deal processing Storage Provider on Calibration network #323

flyworker commented Sep 29, 2021 •

edited by vnessasgrt

Loading

dayou5168 commented Oct 13, 2021

Fatman13 commented Oct 13, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Fatman13 commented Oct 13, 2021

flyworker commented Oct 14, 2021

Fatman13 commented Oct 15, 2021

flyworker commented Oct 15, 2021

cryptowhizzard commented Oct 15, 2021 •

edited

Loading

PatHoo commented Nov 4, 2021

vnessasgrt commented Nov 4, 2021

PatHoo commented Nov 4, 2021

nobsu commented Nov 4, 2021

vnessasgrt commented Nov 4, 2021

cryptowhizzard commented Nov 4, 2021

cloudxin commented Nov 5, 2021

flyworker commented Nov 8, 2021

Fatman13 commented Nov 15, 2021

cryptowhizzard commented Nov 16, 2021

cloudxin commented Nov 19, 2021

vnessasgrt commented Jan 6, 2022 •

edited

Loading

cloudxin commented Jan 6, 2022

vnessasgrt commented Jan 6, 2022

cloudxin commented Jan 7, 2022

nobsu commented Jan 7, 2022

PatHoo commented Jan 7, 2022

PatHoo commented Jan 7, 2022

nobsu commented Jan 11, 2022

flyworker commented Jan 13, 2022

cloudxin commented Jan 17, 2022

flyworker commented Jan 18, 2022

cloudxin commented Jan 18, 2022

flyworker commented Jan 18, 2022

cloudxin commented Jan 19, 2022

longfeiWan9 commented Mar 18, 2022 •

edited

Loading

PatHoo commented Mar 18, 2022

[Storage Provider Bounty Issue] Deal processing Storage Provider on Calibration network #323

[Storage Provider Bounty Issue] Deal processing Storage Provider on Calibration network #323

Comments

flyworker commented Sep 29, 2021 • edited by vnessasgrt Loading

This issue is designed as a collaborative project!

1. Proposed issue:

2. Why is this issue important?

3. Tasks

4. Additional Context

dayou5168 commented Oct 13, 2021

Fatman13 commented Oct 13, 2021 • edited Loading

Fatman13 commented Oct 13, 2021

flyworker commented Oct 14, 2021

Fatman13 commented Oct 15, 2021

flyworker commented Oct 15, 2021

cryptowhizzard commented Oct 15, 2021 • edited Loading

PatHoo commented Nov 4, 2021

vnessasgrt commented Nov 4, 2021

PatHoo commented Nov 4, 2021

nobsu commented Nov 4, 2021

vnessasgrt commented Nov 4, 2021

cryptowhizzard commented Nov 4, 2021

cloudxin commented Nov 5, 2021

flyworker commented Nov 8, 2021

Fatman13 commented Nov 15, 2021

cryptowhizzard commented Nov 16, 2021

cloudxin commented Nov 19, 2021

vnessasgrt commented Jan 6, 2022 • edited Loading

cloudxin commented Jan 6, 2022

vnessasgrt commented Jan 6, 2022

cloudxin commented Jan 7, 2022

nobsu commented Jan 7, 2022

PatHoo commented Jan 7, 2022

PatHoo commented Jan 7, 2022

nobsu commented Jan 11, 2022

flyworker commented Jan 13, 2022

cloudxin commented Jan 17, 2022

flyworker commented Jan 18, 2022

cloudxin commented Jan 18, 2022

flyworker commented Jan 18, 2022

cloudxin commented Jan 19, 2022

longfeiWan9 commented Mar 18, 2022 • edited Loading

PatHoo commented Mar 18, 2022

flyworker commented Sep 29, 2021 •

edited by vnessasgrt

Loading

Fatman13 commented Oct 13, 2021 •

edited

Loading

cryptowhizzard commented Oct 15, 2021 •

edited

Loading

vnessasgrt commented Jan 6, 2022 •

edited

Loading

longfeiWan9 commented Mar 18, 2022 •

edited

Loading