Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Availability layer demo #171

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 10, 2022
Merged

Availability layer demo #171

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 10, 2022

Conversation

xosmig
Copy link
Contributor

@xosmig xosmig commented Aug 2, 2022

No description provided.

@xosmig xosmig force-pushed the dsl-demo branch 2 times, most recently from 821bb88 to 4e04bcc Compare August 5, 2022 15:45
@xosmig xosmig changed the title [Draft] availability layer demo Availability layer demo Aug 5, 2022
@xosmig
Copy link
Contributor Author

xosmig commented Aug 5, 2022

Originally created for the demo day. Ended up not using it (used bcb demo instead), but I think it's pretty neat, so why not keep it :)

@xosmig
Copy link
Contributor Author

xosmig commented Aug 5, 2022

image

@xosmig xosmig marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2022 15:49
@xosmig xosmig force-pushed the dsl-demo branch 2 times, most recently from dc4eec4 to c58c804 Compare August 8, 2022 10:56
Copy link
Contributor

@matejpavlovic matejpavlovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Very useful demo.

samples/availability-layer-demo/control-module.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
samples/availability-layer-demo/control-module.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
samples/availability-layer-demo/control-module.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Demo allows storing and retrieving blocks in the availability
layer.
@xosmig xosmig merged commit d6f5672 into consensus-shipyard:main Aug 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants