Found disagreement in the SM binned differential BR of B2KTauTau with the paper #227
Unanswered
rajeevneutrino
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi @rajeevneutrino, the disagreement that you find might be due to different definitions of what "binned branching ratio" means. Note that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear authors,
The SM value obtained for the "Binned differential branching ratio of B±→K± τ+ τ−" in q2=[15,22] from flavio is 1.79e-8. I wonder why this value doesn't match with the value reported in arXiv:1712.01919v1 which is 1.20e-7. In fact, from my own code I get similar value as reported in the paper.
I find similar disagreements for B2K*tautau (q2=15,19), Bs2Phitautau (q2=15,18.8) decays. However, the BR(Bs2tautau) is perfectly fine.
Kindly help me
Thanks and Regards
Rajeev
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions