Nodoc for recurse_proc #442
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@marcandre, does this seem right to you? |
|
Mmm, that method is public but not clearly related to json. Marking it as |
|
@hsbt, can you take a look? |
|
Same for JSNONiconv and JSON.valid_utf8?, yes? If so, please mod here. |
This was referenced Mar 8, 2021
This was referenced Mar 15, 2021
Open
This was referenced Mar 16, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Suggest :nodoc: for method recurse_proc. It's called only (and optionally) by method load, and may not be useful to JSON users.
If we don't :nodoc: this method, it should at least have some tests, which I think are now lacking.