Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow Bulk Insert (not upsert) of platform events via the CLI. #2254

Closed
jjulicher opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Allow Bulk Insert (not upsert) of platform events via the CLI. #2254

jjulicher opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
feature Issue or pull request for a new feature

Comments

@jjulicher
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Occasionally we need to bulk insert platform events. However, using the bulk upsert command results in an error: InvalidJob : No create/update access for object:LeaseChargesBillings__e (even though the file contains only records without any external Id).

resulting in us to having to manually do a bulk insert via workbench.

What are you trying to do

The ability to bulk insert Platform Events via the CLI.

Describe the solution you'd like

Having either a "data bulk insert" command or having the "data bulk upsert" command recognise platform events by the sobject type extension ('__e') and route the to Bulk API Insert api.

Describe alternatives you've considered

running a curl command to send the file via bulk api.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@jjulicher jjulicher added the feature Issue or pull request for a new feature label Jun 26, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Thank you for filing this feature request. We appreciate your feedback and will review the feature at our next grooming or sprint planning session. We prioritize feature requests with more upvotes and comments.

@git2gus
Copy link

git2gus bot commented Jun 26, 2023

This issue has been linked to a new work item: W-13656292

@forcedotcom forcedotcom locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 1, 2023
@WillieRuemmele WillieRuemmele converted this issue into discussion #2339 Aug 1, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
feature Issue or pull request for a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant