Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can you provide some test cases? #1

Open
Paraoia opened this issue Apr 5, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Can you provide some test cases? #1

Paraoia opened this issue Apr 5, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@Paraoia
Copy link

Paraoia commented Apr 5, 2018

Toe's tests(toe_tb) and implementations are mismatched and do not seem to be implemented completely, especially in the case of mode1 and mode 2.
When testing the RX side, the test in the testVector folder, part of the checksum is incorrect.
In addition, the test case of the TX side and the test case of the mode2 are not given. Can you upload this part of the use case?
The test data and golden used for Toe_script_probably_obsolete.py are also not been uploaded.
Can you provide these test cases ?
Thank you.

@dsidler
Copy link
Collaborator

dsidler commented Apr 12, 2018

I am aware that the test cases are out-dated. In general i think the testing infrastructure could be imporoved quite a lot (e.g. with continous integration) but currently i don't have the time to work on this.

I will check if the existing test cases can be adapted to at least work again.

@liudong16
Copy link

Hi Dsidler, I encountered the same problem while I was testing the TOE part that the test did not pass. Would you like to check or provide some up-to-date test cases? Thanks, sincerely. @dsidler

@YifanYuan3
Copy link

Hi David, can you also please provide the test vectors for the RoCE module (or the corresponding scripts to generate such test vectors)?
In the script they should be

  • write_read_read_large_receiver.in
  • write_read_read_large_receiver.out
  • rdma_txwriteread.in
  • rdma_txwriteread.out

Thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants