Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make FSharp.Core collection functions for Array.Parallel more regular #187

Open
Tracked by #720
baronfel opened this issue Oct 20, 2016 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #720

Make FSharp.Core collection functions for Array.Parallel more regular #187

baronfel opened this issue Oct 20, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
approved-in-principle area: library good first issue Please consider contributing to this! needs rfc proposed-priority

Comments

@baronfel
Copy link
Contributor

baronfel commented Oct 20, 2016 •
edited by dsyme
Loading

Submitted by Jon Harrop on 3/21/2014 12:00:00 AM
63 votes on UserVoice prior to migration

In F# 3.0, lots of standard functions are missing from Array.Parallel including

  • tryFindIndex
  • exists
  • forall
  • filter
  • tryFind
  • reduce
  • minBy
  • maxBy
  • tryPick

A mapReduce function would also be useful.
Efficient implementations of all of these have been described in the F# Journal. http://fsharpnews.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/parallel-aggregates.html

Response

** by fslang-admin on 2/4/2016 12:00:00 AM **

Approved in principle subject to RFC and well-tested implementation being submitted as PR.

Original UserVoice Submission
Archived Uservoice Comments
@dsyme dsyme added the needs rfc label Dec 1, 2017
@dsyme dsyme added good first issue Please consider contributing to this! old votes:50-200 and removed old votes:51-100 old votes:50-200 labels Jun 9, 2022
@dsyme
Copy link
Collaborator

dsyme commented Jun 9, 2022

I've labelled this as "good first issue", please consider submitting an implementation and/or RFC

@vzarytovskii vzarytovskii mentioned this issue Oct 28, 2022
Open
This was referenced Nov 2, 2022
Closed
Merged
This was referenced Feb 28, 2023
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Mar 14, 2023
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved-in-principle area: library good first issue Please consider contributing to this! needs rfc proposed-priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@baronfel @dsyme