Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore!: v0.9.5 #283

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 28, 2021
Merged

chore!: v0.9.5 #283

merged 12 commits into from
Jun 28, 2021

Conversation

enthusiastmartin
Copy link
Contributor

Description

v0.9.5

@auto-add-label auto-add-label bot added the chore label Jun 21, 2021
@enthusiastmartin enthusiastmartin linked an issue Jun 21, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
@enthusiastmartin enthusiastmartin marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2021 08:40
@jak-pan jak-pan changed the title chore: v0.9.5 chore!: v0.9.5 Jun 22, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@Roznovjak Roznovjak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I'm not super familiar with the changes in service.rs.

orml_tokens::Event::Reserved(asset_a, 2, 1000000000000).into(),
orml_tokens::Event::Reserved(asset_b, 3, 2000000000000).into(),
orml_tokens::Event::Reserved(asset_b, 2, 2000000000).into(),
orml_tokens::Event::Reserved(asset_b, 3, 4000000000).into(),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was wondering if this repetitive part could be setup and reused as a function?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes.possibly. but i have noticed little discrepancy in this, so i investigate that first. And when all good, we can handle this kind of improvement.

@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ impl Filter<Call> for BaseFilter {

Call::XYK(_)
| Call::AssetRegistry(_)
| Call::Balances(_)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will staking, governance etc. work?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should. It was tested previously with treasury tip.

Copy link
Member

@mrq1911 mrq1911 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please bump versions and test running main chain node

@mrq1911 mrq1911 merged commit e5692e3 into master Jun 28, 2021
@jak-pan jak-pan deleted the v0.9.5 branch February 22, 2024 10:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upgrade substrate to basilisk version
4 participants