You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 5, 2024. It is now read-only.
Existing trusted mappings should be analysed for consistency. E.g.
If there is a mapping α = β or α < β then there must not be a mapping β > α
If there is a mapping α > β then there must not be a mapping α = β or α < β
For every mapping α = β or α < β if β (α ≤ β) has no narrower classes then for all transitively narrower classes γ of α there is an implicit mapping γ < β. If a counter-case of a transitively narrower classe γ of α is found where the mapping relation γ < β does not hold, then the mapping α = β oder α < β must be wrong.
In short, the network of KOS hierarchy and mapping relations must be a partial order (poset) or directed acyclic graph (DAG).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Existing trusted mappings should be analysed for consistency. E.g.
If there is a mapping α = β or α < β then there must not be a mapping β > α
If there is a mapping α > β then there must not be a mapping α = β or α < β
For every mapping α = β or α < β if β (α ≤ β) has no narrower classes then for all transitively narrower classes γ of α there is an implicit mapping γ < β. If a counter-case of a transitively narrower classe γ of α is found where the mapping relation γ < β does not hold, then the mapping α = β oder α < β must be wrong.
In short, the network of KOS hierarchy and mapping relations must be a partial order (poset) or directed acyclic graph (DAG).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: