Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distro package maintainers #103

Open
ggozad opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Distro package maintainers #103

ggozad opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@ggozad
Copy link
Owner

ggozad commented Aug 21, 2024

Currently oterm exists on PyPi, homebrew, Arch & NixOS.
It would be nice to get commitment from maintainers that they will be updating regularly their platforms.
AFAIK
@suhr maintains NixOS but we are stuck on 0.2.9
@DanielChesters maintains Arch. (up to date)
I release on PyPi the canonical version as well as maintain the homebrew formula.

  • @suhr are you able to keep maintaining the package or should we try to find someone else?
  • Can we find maintainers for other popular distros such as Debian & friends etc?
  • Is it possible to automate some of this through GitHub actions?

I am planning to move away from Poetry to uv (https://github.com/astral-sh/uv), this is done in #102 .
Things missing from there is basically GitHub actions that publish the package to PyPi and potentially to distros.

[EDIT]
#102 has been merged, we now use uv.

@ggozad ggozad added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Aug 21, 2024
@yilmaz08
Copy link
Contributor

I currently have Arch Linux on my pc and NixOS on my server. Maybe I can try packaging for NixOS but I don't know much about that.

@suhr
Copy link
Contributor

suhr commented Aug 21, 2024

I would like if someone else maintained this package.

Maybe I can try packaging for NixOS but I don't know much about that.

Since there's already a package, you only need to update it.

@suhr
Copy link
Contributor

suhr commented Aug 23, 2024

It seems like my involvement was not required to update the package: NixOS/nixpkgs#336821

@yilmaz08
Copy link
Contributor

yilmaz08 commented Aug 23, 2024

It seems like only the hash and version was changed but actually there was a bigger change in #102 which switched to uv from poetry. I still don't know much about nix packaging but I don't think it is correct

I don't know how this even passes tests

@suhr
Copy link
Contributor

suhr commented Aug 23, 2024

I was able to build it and run nonetheless.
2024-08-24-013224_3840x2160_scrot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants