You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From godot 3 and the addition of particles material, 2D and 3D share same code. Properties bounds that works well or have a significative impact in 3D doesn´t have much effect in 2D and backwards (bounds seems to be programmed with 3D in mind). I was looking for change this bounds in:
But if i change that for do feasible some effects that with actual bounds you can´t get in 2D... well, parameter-bound for 3D become oversized. This can be accomplished by separating both codes... I do not feel capable to do that, so this is a ... feature request?
But if nobody have problem with upper bounds for 3D (Doesn´t break compatibility, only can make crazy effects in the upper side of the bound....), I can change directly this code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Godot version:
Godot 3 upt to master
OS/device including version:
All
Issue description:
From godot 3 and the addition of particles material, 2D and 3D share same code. Properties bounds that works well or have a significative impact in 3D doesn´t have much effect in 2D and backwards (bounds seems to be programmed with 3D in mind). I was looking for change this bounds in:
scene\3d\particles.cpp:
void ParticlesMaterial::_bind_methods()
But if i change that for do feasible some effects that with actual bounds you can´t get in 2D... well, parameter-bound for 3D become oversized. This can be accomplished by separating both codes... I do not feel capable to do that, so this is a ... feature request?
But if nobody have problem with upper bounds for 3D (Doesn´t break compatibility, only can make crazy effects in the upper side of the bound....), I can change directly this code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: