-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
runtime: TestCgoPprofCallback hang on linux-arm #54778
Comments
Looks like reproducing this with |
Perhaps related: the test sometimes fails on linux-amd64-longtest, e.g. https://build.golang.org/log/a86dc70291e4f1c534e8798731dcec91160e5e99:
|
This is not the same as #54885, since that was introduced on 2022-09-02 and the original failure here happened well before that. |
That one failure on linux/arm has been the only one since. Aside from a stream of persistent failures on longtest builders (that seem to be fixed), these are the latest 3: 2022-11-09T22:56:44-89332e0/openbsd-amd64-68 |
This is marked "release-blocker" but is also in "Backlog." I'm not sure what the means, so I'm moving it to the 1.20 milestone. |
This one appears to be unrelated. |
One more failing TestCgoPprofCallback: This looks like a different bug, though. |
This was discussed in the release weekly meeting-- it would be great to find out more about this bug so that we can re-evaluate it as a release blocker. Thanks. |
Ping -- we're getting close to the release. |
Found new dashboard test flakes for:
2022-11-18 23:57 openbsd-386-71 go@04d6aa65 runtime.TestCgoPprofCallback (log)
2022-11-21 17:16 openbsd-amd64-71 go@998949c0 runtime.TestCgoPprofCallback (log)
2022-12-06 19:52 openbsd-386-71 go@03bf6f49 runtime.TestCgoPprofCallback (log)
2022-12-09 21:38 openbsd-amd64-68 go@e8f78cb6 runtime.TestCgoPprofCallback (log)
|
All the linux-amd64-longtest and linux-386-longtest failures are build with All the other failures appear to be on slow machines. This is a CPU intensive test: it calls So I think this is a flaky test. I think we should not return this CPU intensive test in parallel with other tests, and since it takes a full second I think we should not run it in short mode. CC @prattmic for other opinions since he wrote the test. |
Change https://go.dev/cl/460461 mentions this issue: |
The |
The |
2022-08-26T18:09:56-62125c9/linux-arm-aws
The failure is giant so no summary here.
cc @golang/runtime
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: