Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider support for .Net Core #96

Closed
SaanichGAS opened this issue Feb 9, 2017 · 18 comments
Closed

Consider support for .Net Core #96

SaanichGAS opened this issue Feb 9, 2017 · 18 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@SaanichGAS
Copy link

Given the push to .Net Core for many C# applications and services, it would be helpful to have a client library that supports this; in particular for cases where platforms such as AWS Lambda are being considered (which requires .Net Core for C# implementation).

@AnashOommen AnashOommen self-assigned this Feb 10, 2017
@AnashOommen AnashOommen added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 10, 2017
@AnashOommen
Copy link
Member

We have work in progress towards this goal. Two of the major pieces are being worked on right now (Moving to WCF and bumping the runtime requirement to 4.5.2). Once those go live, we will run the .NET Portability Analyzer to analyze and fix additional dependencies (there shouldn't be too much of them).

@dwdickens
Copy link

+1. Looking forward to this!

@edblackburn
Copy link

Hi @AnashOommen may I enquire as to how this is progressing? Do you have insight into lead times? Are we weeks or months away, is there much priority attributed to dotnetcore currently? Many thanks, Ed

@rfrancisco
Copy link

Any news regarding this? We are currently migrating a solution, and that migration was planned couple of months ago expecting to have the dfp api available. We know that things get delayed, and that's fine, but could you provide us with an ideia of the progress that has been made towards this goal, and if possible an ideia of when this could become available?

Thanks in advance

@christopherseeley
Copy link
Member

We're working to upgrade our SOAP toolkit, which is the major blocker. Do you have a particular version of Core that you need? Also, to confirm you're looking to use the DFP SOAP trafficking API correct? This client library doesn't handle ad serving.

@rfrancisco
Copy link

Yes, we use this API to do many things, some of witch are: query DFP inventory, write custom attributes in orders, orderlines, etc, update creative wrappers, etc...

@christopherseeley
Copy link
Member

As an update here, v21.0.0 updated the SOAP toolkit which was the major blocker. We're looking into .NET Standard 2.0 support which would bring .NET Core 2.0 support.

@rfrancisco
Copy link

Is this something you are planning to do for the next release?

@4nonym0us
Copy link

+1. Would be great to have .NET Core support.

@thaDude
Copy link

thaDude commented Oct 25, 2017

Hello, any news on this? Thanks.

@rfrancisco
Copy link

Hi guys. Its been almost 4 months since @christopherseeley mentioned that the SOAP toolkit had been migrated and that you were looking into .Net Standard 2 support.
Could you give us an update on this? And if possible a possible timetable for .Net core support

@christopherseeley
Copy link
Member

We're working through replacing other dependencies that aren't .NET Standard compatible. There's no hard timetable at the moment but it's something we're actively working on, and a high priority.

@rfrancisco
Copy link

Could you provide a rough estimate?

@christopherseeley
Copy link
Member

I opened #125, #126, and #127 which are the remaining blockers. The library can add .NET Standard 2.0 support after these are resolved.

@AnashOommen
Copy link
Member

I also opened #128 as yet another blocker.

@goncalolucas
Copy link

Hi, any news on this? Any estimate date? Thanks.

@christopherseeley
Copy link
Member

We're planning on a release with .NET Standard 2.0 support by end of this quarter.

@christopherseeley
Copy link
Member

Added support for .NET Standard in v23.0.0.
Note that there are some .NET Core specific issues that impact our library. See issue #133 and issue #134 for details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants