-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Method signature elements that are repeated fields are not handled properly #413
Labels
generator
Bugs, features, and so forth pertaining to the generated client surface
priority: p2
Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.
🚨
This issue needs some love.
type: bug
Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
Comments
software-dov
added
type: bug
Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
priority: p2
Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.
generator
Bugs, features, and so forth pertaining to the generated client surface
labels
May 11, 2020
This was referenced May 11, 2020
yoshi-automation
added
🚨
This issue needs some love.
and removed
🚨
This issue needs some love.
labels
Sep 3, 2020
Pretty sure this has been fixed in the templates, but can reopen if it's not actually the case. |
This is still an issue in googleapis/python-aiplatform. The owlbot.py file has a workaround. I removed the workaround and the sample tests failed with
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
generator
Bugs, features, and so forth pertaining to the generated client surface
priority: p2
Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.
🚨
This issue needs some love.
type: bug
Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
Minimal reproducible code:
In the portion of the client method that constructs the request, the following lines occur
This causes protobuf to raise an error because
request.intputs
is a repeated field.The solution is to do the following instead:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: