Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core: enhanced noopener output #5857

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 20, 2018
Merged

core: enhanced noopener output #5857

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 20, 2018

Conversation

patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary
cleans up TODO for including outerHTML in noopener link audit and does some related page-functions/dom-helpers cleanup along the way :)

Copy link
Member

@brendankenny brendankenny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

(with question over to @paulirish which probably should just result in filing a new issue if I'm actually remembering)

}

module.exports = {
getElementsInDocumentFnString: getElementsInDocument.toString(),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@paulirish I can't remember if you were an advocate for all the page functions to be exposed as strings or if it was the opposite (or if your opinion has changed over time)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmmm i dont think i cared, but i like the idea of them being exported as strings.

we can do in a followup. 👩‍🚒

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

followup sg :)

@patrickhulce patrickhulce merged commit 8e18e75 into master Aug 20, 2018
@patrickhulce patrickhulce deleted the outerhtml_noopener branch August 20, 2018 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants