Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jackson databind 2.9 includes a breaking change #137

Closed
maladon opened this issue Mar 8, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

jackson databind 2.9 includes a breaking change #137

maladon opened this issue Mar 8, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@maladon
Copy link

maladon commented Mar 8, 2018

Jackson databind DeserializationConfig in 2.9 does not have a with() that has DateFormat included. This call is attempted in ObjectMapper's static initializer. This breaks anyone with more recent Spring versions.

2.9:
http://fasterxml.github.io/jackson-databind/javadoc/2.9/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/DeserializationConfig.html

2.8:
http://fasterxml.github.io/jackson-databind/javadoc/2.8/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/DeserializationConfig.html

@xhliu
Copy link

xhliu commented Jul 18, 2018

I'm experiencing this issue with Spring 2.0.3.RELEASE. How to fix it?

@husnjak
Copy link

husnjak commented Oct 9, 2018

I fixed it by forking and creating a new release
here is my fork: https://github.com/husnjak/jesque

I used jitpack to download the jar using gradle: https://jitpack.io/#husnjak/jesque/2.1.2-hus

dependencies {
    compile 'com.github.husnjak:jesque:2.1.2-hus'
}

@bbpennel
Copy link

It looks like this was addressed on master about 5 months ago https://github.com/gresrun/jesque/blame/master/src/main/java/net/greghaines/jesque/json/ObjectMapperFactory.java#L36
Are there plans to do an official release soon?

@rteabeault
Copy link

I am having this issue as well. Can we get a public release of this fix?

@gresrun
Copy link
Owner

gresrun commented Jan 11, 2019

Version 2.1.3 should be on Maven Central in a few hours.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants