You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
grpc-dotnet does not have a fast creation of server objects (at least in the tutorials). I don't want to rely on the aspnet core infrastructure when it comes to a class library.
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Currently no.
Additional context
Add any other context about the feature request here.
Due to the fact that Grpc.Core is about to be deprecated, I still want the neat API that Grpc.Core provides. Please consider this request because it is not appropriate for a class library to depend on aspnet core.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
it is not appropriate for a class library to depend on aspnet core
Sorry, but that isn't possible. Grpc.Core brings in a whole HTTP2 stack, whereas this Grpc library is built on top of the ASP.NET Core HTTP2 stack, it doesn't bundle its own.
Are you concerned that this library requires ASP.NET Core, or that you have to write ConfigureServices etc. when using Grpc server?
In 6.0 we have the minimal hosting feature coming in that makes your code smaller for startup dotnet/aspnetcore#32378
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
grpc-dotnet
does not have a fast creation of server objects (at least in the tutorials). I don't want to rely on the aspnet core infrastructure when it comes to a class library.Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Support something like the following:
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Currently no.
Additional context
Add any other context about the feature request here.
Due to the fact that
Grpc.Core
is about to be deprecated, I still want the neat API thatGrpc.Core
provides. Please consider this request because it is not appropriate for a class library to depend on aspnet core.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: