Release 2.1.7 Improvements to Simple Volumetric Model (SVM) #78
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
After importing models and constraints, how can the results be exported as shape files |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not sure how far along you are working with the SVM, but if you've created an SVM properties file for your project, then you can use it to specify shapefile outputs. The main discussion of the SVM setup is at https://gwlucastrig.github.io/TinfourDocs/HydrographySimpleVolumetricModel/index.html
In the example file, I was dealing with Lake Alan Henry, so I named the shapefiles accordingly. You will probably want to pick names more suitable to your own project. And, of course, you'll want to uncomment the two specifications... I hope this gets you started. Feel free to post more questions if you encounter any more roadblocks. Also, I'd love to hear more about what you are doing with the SVM. I haven't received any feedback from users, so I haven't had a lot of information in terms of improving the model. Gary |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The majority of the work for release 2.1.7 was directed to improving the Simple Volumetric Model (SVM). This model uses the Delaunay triangulation to model reservoir capacity with respect to changing water levels. Improvements to the module included better integration with standard GIS utilities, including the ability to export GIS-compatible contours in shapefile format and raster data in floating-point grid format. In support of these changes, the GIS module was improved for better shapefile support.
A number of other bugs and code clean up changes were also implemented.
This discussion was created from the release Release 2.1.7 Improvements to Simple Volumetric Model (SVM).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions