Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
88 lines (64 loc) · 6.63 KB

RELEASE-MANAGEMENT-PLAN.md

File metadata and controls

88 lines (64 loc) · 6.63 KB

Release Management Plan

This document describes general approach to release management for the Guardian codebase, and contains a detailed sequence of events/actions required for the production of releases. The purpose of this document is to inform the community about the process, and provide guidance to internal teams working on the product.

Release schedule and numbering

The Guardian development team follows Scrum methodology with 2-week sprints. Software releases are produced on regular cadence every other sprint, i.e every 4 weeks; regardless of the status of features in development. Releases are produced on Tuesdays at 12:00 EST, following the go/no-go decisition taken at the end-of-sprint review on Friday previous week.

The Guardian uses semantic versioning for releases in the major.minor.build format. Each number incremented sequentially to denote the following changes:

  • major: a significant milestone in product lifecycle has been reached
  • minor: the release contains notable new capabilities
  • build: incremental release bringing enhancements and bug fixes

Guardian version numbers also reflect changes in the API delivered by the release. Detailed description of the API lifecycle management and versioning is available in the API Versioning and Deprecation Policy.

Release process

The Guardian release process is built around the sprint cycle, where each sprint ends with the codebase in the 'releasable' state. The difference between the alternating release sprints and non-release sprints is in the set of activities forming the release:

  • tagging the codebase with the release tag.
  • release testing.
  • packaging and uploading artifacts into external repositories.

Feature development cycle

An inception-to-release lifecycle of a new enchacement is usually 3 sprints long:

  • One sprint (or longer, or shorter) is dedicated to MRD/PRD work by the product team. Developers are not actively working on the feature during this period, their involvement is limited to providing SME (Subject Matter Expert) consulting services to Product.
  • Next sprint is dedicated to refining, scoping, estimating, prioritizing and planning features into tasks for the development backlog. This requires collaborative work between development and product.
  • The last sprint is implementation of the task.

It can be summarised in the following table:

Sprint 1 Sprint 2 Sprint 3
Product MRD/PRD, business priorities Lead refinement, plan Monitor, answer question
Dev Consult Prod Refine, scope and estimate Implement

Sprint flow

Product management and stakeholders create MRDs/PRDs for product features outside of the Scrum framework (in Sprint 1 and/or early in Sprint 2). Development starts getting involved in planning with the Refinement Scrum ceremony, during which issues are estimated, split into tasks (if required), discussed and clarified.

The team enters a new sprint with a defined scope: list of estimated and assigned issues ready to be worked on for the next two weeks.

Daily Scrum ceremony insures that development is synced up on all activites, and any blockers and obstacles are promptly reserved.

Developers submit PRs, which get merged into 'Develop' branch after peer review which also validates that presence of the unit tests covering the new code.

Features are marked as Done when they satisfy the definition of done after the review of the 'acceptance criteria' by the product team and stakeholders.

After the Sprint ended, the Product Owner leads the Sprint Review ceremony on Monday

  • Entire team is present
  • Stakeholders invited
  • Product Owner delivers a sprint report (with charts and statistics of the sprint)
  • Developers demo completed features, which includes showing unit tests and documentation (where relevant). For features without exposure through a UI developers will demo the successful run of the unit test.

On Tuesday the Product Owner holds a 'Retrospective' meeting where developers discuss between themselves successes/failures of the previous sprint and opportunities for improvements.

Release flow

Development release cycle consists of two sprints: development sprint followed by the release sprint. Development sprint is fully dedicated to normal development activities, release sprints contain consist of two stages:

  • a week-long development stage (the same as in the development sprint), which ends with the 'code freeze'
  • a week-long 'stabilization' stage, during which team resources are allocated to testing, bug fixing and documentation. No new development work is performed during this period.

The 'stabilisation' stage of the release sprint starts the following additional activities:

  • Product Manager tags the release and runs release CI pipeline, following which verifies that it completed successfully.
  • Product Manager tags the Develop branch with the new pre-release version.
  • Product Manager or Lead developer creates a PR and squash-merges into the update from the Develop into the Main branch.
  • Product Manager tags the Main branch with the pre-release.
  • Product Manager makes a pre-release in the Main branch.
  • Product Manager prepares a pre-release ChangeLog document.
  • Product Manager prepares a pre-release Release notes.
  • Product Owner posts community announcements in the discord and slack channels about the availability of the pre-release, to enable members of the community to assess the release impact and prepare for the upgrade.

The entire team, with the help of the wider community, tests the Release for a week, fixing defects, developing additional unit-tests, and improving/fixing documentation. Other activities include:

  • Documentation review by the Product Manager, Product Owner and stakeholders.
  • Unit tests verification by the lead developer.
  • Demo environment sanity tested by lead developer, product team and/or stakeholders.

At the end of the release sprint Product Owner facilitates the discussion with Product Manager and members of the Dev and QA teams on the release go/no-go decisions. Following a positive decision the PM tags the codebase with the release version and makes the release ensuring all release artefacts get uploaded into their distribution repositories.

Artifacts list

  • Source code archives (in github)
  • Docker image (TBD: in Docker Hub)
  • Npm packages (TBD: in NPM registry)
    • Message Broker
    • UI Service
    • Guardian Service
    • MRV Sender Service
  • Changelog and release notes (Notes attached to the release label in github)
  • User guide and demo guide (.md file in github)