Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NET-6464] lock down init container #3959

Conversation

sarahalsmiller
Copy link
Member

Changes proposed in this PR

  • Lock down security context in init container and remove open shift gating

How I've tested this PR

How I expect reviewers to test this PR

Checklist

@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller added pr/no-changelog PR does not need a corresponding .changelog entry backport/1.4.x labels May 1, 2024
@jm96441n
Copy link
Member

jm96441n commented May 2, 2024

LGTM, but similar here I think we should probably have a changelog entry for this

@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller force-pushed the NET-6464-Lock-down-security-context-for-API-gateway-connect-inject-init-container branch 2 times, most recently from a9a1165 to c09b53b Compare May 6, 2024 17:08
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller removed the pr/no-changelog PR does not need a corresponding .changelog entry label May 6, 2024
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller force-pushed the NET-6464-Lock-down-security-context-for-API-gateway-connect-inject-init-container branch from c09b53b to 830917a Compare May 7, 2024 21:57
@nathancoleman nathancoleman changed the title lock down init container [NET-6464] lock down init container Jun 4, 2024
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller enabled auto-merge (squash) June 4, 2024 16:46
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller merged commit c08b7b0 into main Jun 4, 2024
28 of 53 checks passed
@sarahalsmiller sarahalsmiller deleted the NET-6464-Lock-down-security-context-for-API-gateway-connect-inject-init-container branch June 4, 2024 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants