-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: nodejs14.x support for aws_lambda_function #17450
Comments
@willfarrell Thanks for raising this issue. |
Thanks, I hoped it was as simple as updating the SDK. But wanted to raise, just in case it wasn't. |
This has been released in version 3.27.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks! |
@willfarrell @ewbankkit what terraform version are u guys using ? We are seeing same issue Error: expected runtime to be one of [nodejs nodejs4.3 nodejs6.10 nodejs8.10 nodejs10.x nodejs12.x java8 java8.al2 java11 python2.7 python3.6 python3.7 python3.8 dotnetcore1.0 dotnetcore2.0 dotnetcore2.1 dotnetcore3.1 nodejs4.3-edge go1.x ruby2.5 ruby2.7 provided provided.al2], got nodejs14.x When we are at |
I'm using terraform v0.13.6 with aws v3.27.0. |
@ewbankkit i tested with 3.18.0 and terraform 0.14 still getting same error |
Works for me with TF
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Description
The Nodejs v14 runtime has been released for Lambda.
Currently returns:
New or Affected Resource(s)
References
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2021/02/aws-lambda-now-supports-node-js-14/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: