Add support for logging_config in aws_lambda_function resource

[JamesJJ]

Description

Add logging_config configuration block in support of AWS Lambda advanced logging controls.

Relations

Closes #34455

References

• Docs: AWS Lambda advanced logging controls

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc 'TESTS=TestAccLambdaFunction(DataSource)?_(basic|loggingConfig)'  PKG=lambda
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/lambda/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccLambdaFunction(DataSource)?_(basic|loggingConfig)'  -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic
=== RUN   TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig
=== PAUSE TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig
=== RUN   TestAccLambdaFunction_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccLambdaFunction_basic
=== RUN   TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig
=== PAUSE TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig
=== CONT  TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic
=== CONT  TestAccLambdaFunction_basic
=== CONT  TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig
=== CONT  TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic (46.67s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaFunction_basic (66.52s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig (82.18s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig (99.37s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/lambda	102.569s

[github-actions]

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
• Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

• Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
• For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
• Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

[ewbankkit]

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccLambdaFunction_basic\|TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig\|TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic\|TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig' PKG=lambda ACCTEST_PARALLELISM=2
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/lambda/... -v -count 1 -parallel 2  -run=TestAccLambdaFunction_basic\|TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig\|TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic\|TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic
=== RUN   TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig
=== PAUSE TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig
=== RUN   TestAccLambdaFunction_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccLambdaFunction_basic
=== RUN   TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig
=== PAUSE TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig
=== CONT  TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic
=== CONT  TestAccLambdaFunction_basic
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_basic (32.02s)
=== CONT  TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig
=== CONT  TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaFunction_basic (46.50s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaFunctionDataSource_loggingConfig (50.22s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaFunction_loggingConfig (65.39s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/lambda	103.402s

[ewbankkit]

@JamesJJ Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v5.32.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

[Michagogo]

It seems the optional arguments aren’t handled properly in terms of default values being read on refresh, see above bug

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.