Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "increase max capacity for eventhub namespaces to 100" #3440

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2019

Conversation

katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte commented May 15, 2019

Reverts #3049

SDK & RP & portal enforces 20

@katbyte katbyte added this to the v1.28.0 milestone May 15, 2019
@ghost ghost added the size/XS label May 15, 2019
Copy link
Collaborator

@WodansSon WodansSon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @katbyte LGTM!! 👍

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 7fa4438 into master May 15, 2019
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2019
@katbyte katbyte deleted the revert-3049-eventhub_namespace_capacity branch May 15, 2019 00:47
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 17, 2019

This has been released in version 1.28.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
	version = "~> 1.28.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 14, 2019

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 14, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants