Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_app_service - supporting client_affinity_enabled being false #973

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2018

Conversation

sabbox
Copy link
Contributor

@sabbox sabbox commented Mar 13, 2018

This PR fixes issue #780
Client Affinity setting wasn't respected if it is set to 'false'

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff added this to the 1.3.0 milestone Mar 13, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey @sabbox

Thanks for this PR - I've taken a look through and this looks good; I'll kick off the acceptance tests now, but this otherwise LGTM 👍

Thanks!

@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

Tests pass:

screen shot 2018-03-13 at 16 09 33

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff merged commit ce16d5c into hashicorp:master Mar 13, 2018
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff changed the title Client Affinity setting not applied. azurerm_app_service - supporting client_affinity_enabled being false Mar 13, 2018
tombuildsstuff added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2018
@sabbox sabbox deleted the client-affinity branch March 14, 2018 07:32
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 31, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants