Add -no-color option for subcommands #2414
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Nice detective work! 🔍
I doubt it. Poking around the git trees - this seems to be an accident of history more than anything. Seems a bit janky to keep |
phinze
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2015
Add -no-color option for subcommands
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
ghost
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This piece of code is apparently responsible for deciding whether to colorize the output:
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/blob/master/command/meta.go#L349-357
but that function is effectively removing the
-no-colorfrom arguments list, but only setting the internalcolorproperty, therefore when theMetastruct (already havingcolor=falseand no argument to be processed) is passed down to the subcommand, it will take the defaultColorwhich istrueand turn color always back on.Closes #2333
Was there any specific intention with
color/Color?