Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ENV['no_proxy'] to chef provisioner if no_proxy is detected #4661

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2016
Merged

Add ENV['no_proxy'] to chef provisioner if no_proxy is detected #4661

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2016

Conversation

jason-riddle
Copy link
Contributor

This adds the no_proxy environment variable to the chef provisioner. For some reason ENV['http_proxy'] and ENV['https_proxy'] were added, but ENV['no_proxy'] was not added.

@jason-riddle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alright, I thought this was just a quick fix. I'll take a look at the failing tests when I have the chance.

@jason-riddle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alright, looks like the tests passed. Please let me know if you need anything else before merging.

@svanharmelen
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM! Thanks @jason-riddle!

svanharmelen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2016
Add ENV['no_proxy'] to chef provisioner if no_proxy is detected
@svanharmelen svanharmelen merged commit 52d1e21 into hashicorp:master Jan 15, 2016
@jason-riddle jason-riddle deleted the patch-1 branch January 15, 2016 20:47
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 28, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 28, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants