Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/cloudstack: make the CloudStack provider more inline with the other providers #6010

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2016
Merged

provider/cloudstack: make the CloudStack provider more inline with the other providers #6010

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2016

Conversation

svanharmelen
Copy link
Contributor

It turns out all other providers use ip_address where the CloudStack
provider uses ipaddress. To make this more consistent this PR
deprecates ipaddress and adds ip_address where needed…

It turns out all other providers use `ip_address` where the CloudStack
provider uses `ipaddress`. To make this more consistent this PR
deprecates `ipaddress` and adds `ip_address` where needed…
@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Apr 5, 2016

Purely from a code point of view, this LGTM! I haven't been able to run any tests for this as I don't have any way to run CloudStack though :)

@svanharmelen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review @stack72! I executed the acceptance tests before creating the PR, so that part is covered. Still need to check if we can setup an account for the TF automated acc tests so we can cover the CloudStack tests with those as well...

@svanharmelen svanharmelen merged commit 5e6af8e into hashicorp:master Apr 5, 2016
@svanharmelen svanharmelen deleted the f-deprecate-ipaddress branch April 5, 2016 19:54
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 26, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 26, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants