Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/azurerm: DNS CNAME resource wasn't posting records #7113

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2016

Conversation

stack72
Copy link
Contributor

@stack72 stack72 commented Jun 10, 2016

Azure changed the API for CNAME at some point and since then we haven't
been creating CNAME records. The API changes from []records to a single
record

This PR changes the schema for dns cnames to have a record parameter and
adds a deprecation warning around records. Talked with @jen20 on this
and we decided that it's currently broken and we should handle this as
part of 0.7 where there are other breaking changes

TF_LOG=1 make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm
TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord' 2>~/tf.log
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_basic (97.22s)
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_subdomain
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_subdomain (94.94s)
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_updateRecords
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_updateRecords (116.62s)

Azure changed the API for CNAME at some point and since then we haven't
been creating CNAME records. The API changes from []records to a single
record

This PR changes the schema for dns cnames to have a record parameter and
adds a deprecation warning around records. Talked with @jen20 on this
and we decided that it's currently broken and we should handle this as
part of 0.7 where there are other breaking changes

```
TF_LOG=1 make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm
TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord' 2>~/tf.log
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_basic (97.22s)
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_subdomain
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_subdomain (94.94s)
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_updateRecords
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsCNameRecord_updateRecords (116.62s)
```
Optional: true,
Elem: &schema.Schema{Type: schema.TypeString},
Set: schema.HashString,
Deprecated: "Use `record` instead. This attribute will be removed in a future version",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we have Removed which is an error instead of a warning. I think that's what you want here since we don't handle "records" anymore right?

@phinze
Copy link
Contributor

phinze commented Jun 10, 2016

Agreed with the "currently broken - fix w/ 0.7" strategy.

LGTM! Merge is all yours and add a note to the top of the changelog when you do. 👍

@stack72 stack72 merged commit 5644545 into master Jun 10, 2016
@stack72 stack72 deleted the b-arm-dns-cname branch June 10, 2016 21:53
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 25, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 25, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants